language

Status
Not open for further replies.

princesabharwal

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Hi,

please let me know if the sentence mentioned below is correct"

1) Human beings are the only species who are capable of thought.

Kind Regards

Prince Sabharwal
 

2006

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Hi,

Please let me know if the sentence [STRIKE]mentioned[/STRIKE] below is correct.


Human beings are the only species capable of thought. :tick:

I wouldn't say "who are"; if you want to add something there, I would say 'that is'.

Human beings are the only species that is capable of thought.
Kind Regards

Prince Sabharwal
2006
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Human beings are the only species that is capable of thought.

Hmm.
Homo sapiens is the only species capable of thought.
Human beings belong to the only species that is capable of thought.

'Human beings' aren't a species as such; they are members of a species, or even a genus. They are people.
Even "The human is the only species capable of thought" sounds odd, especially given that it's the genus Homo that determines hominids.
Was Homo erectus human?

 

2006

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Human beings are the only species that is capable of thought.

Hmm.
Homo sapiens is the only species capable of thought.
Human beings belong to the only species that is capable of thought.

'Human beings' aren't a species as such; they are members of a species, or even a genus. They are people.
Even "The human is the only species capable of thought" sounds odd, especially given that it's the genus Homo that determines hominids.
Was Homo erectus human?

The sentence in the original post indicates that human beings (are)(constitute)(belong to) a species........capable of thought.
That's what we have to work with. Homo erectus is irrelevant here; we are talking about present-day people. And we are focussed on English, not on evolutionary biology and its classification.

"people" can be referred to as 'who', but the operative word is "species", which is singular, and a "species" is not a "who".

That's why I would say 'Human beings are the only species (that is) capable of thought.'

Other thoughts are welcome. :-D
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
The sentence in the original post indicates that human beings (are)(constitute)(belong to) a species........capable of thought.
That's what we have to work with. Homo erectus is irrelevant here; we are talking about present-day people. And we are focussed on English, not on evolutionary biology and its classification.

"people" can be referred to as 'who', but the operative word is "species", which is singular, and a "species" is not a "who".

That's why I would say 'Human beings are the only species (that is) capable of thought.'

Other thoughts are welcome. :-D

"A species" is singular so it cannot be preceded by "are". You have to word it so that it says ".........is the only species".
 

2006

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
"A species" is singular so it cannot be preceded by "are". You have to word it so that it says ".........is the only species".
But the "are" refers to human beings, not to species.
The five people are a group formed to study the issue.

Dogs are a species, not a class or family.
The dog is a species, not a class or family.

Again, I am not focussing on taxonomy; I am focussing on English.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top