[Grammar] more than (was) reported

Status
Not open for further replies.

LQZ

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
1 There were more casualties than was reported.
2 There were more casualties than reported.

Dear teacher,

Are both 1 and 2 grammartically correct? If yes, could you explain to me why "was" can be omitted? and there is any rule I can comply with? Thanks.


LQZ
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
1 There were more casualties than was reported.
2 There were more casualties than reported.

Dear teacher,

Are both 1 and 2 grammartically correct? If yes, could you explain to me why "was" can be omitted? and there is any rule I can comply with? Thanks.


LQZ

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Good morning, LQZ.

(1) As I type, no one else has answered.

(2) If I start, maybe one of the teachers will answer us.

(3) I am about 75% sure that your sentence should read:

There were more casualties than WERE reported.

(a) I say this because maybe (maybe) your sentence means something

like:

More casualties occurred than the casualties that WERE actually reported.

(i) As you can see, "were" is necessary in order to agree with "casualties."

(4) I love rules, too. Sadly, I could not find a good, clear, definite rule.

The books just say that sometimes we can delete the subject or verb if

the sentence is "clear."

(a) So that learners are not confused, it would probably be better NOT

to delete "were."

(5) By the way, if (a big "IF") I read my books correctly, there is NO

missing subject in your sentence. That is, it is not considered "correct"

nowadays to say:

There were more casualties than WHAT were reported.

Have a nice day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top