My chemical poetry

Not open for further replies.


May 29, 2004

Dear Sirs!For the forum please!
Please see the paper about UFO,s materials.
Thank you.Sincerely,Henadzi Filipenka,teacher of

Dear Sirs!The information, contained in the project is
in my
the evidence of its extraterrestrial origin.

of decoding of 'The Stormer Effect'

The phenomenon is described by C.Stormer in his
work 'The
Problem of Aurora Borealis' in the chapter
entitled 'The
Echo of Short Waves, Which Comes Back in Many Seconds
The Main Signal'.

In 1928 the radio- engineer Jorgen Hals from Bigder
near Oslo
informed C.Stormer about an odd radio echo received 3
seconds after the cessation of the main signal;
besides, an
ordinary echo encircling the Earth within 1/7 of a
was received.

In July Prof. Stormer spoke to Dr. Van-der-Paul in
and they decided to carry out experiments in autumn
and send
telegraphic signals in the form of undamped waves
every 20
seconds three dashes one after the other. On 11
October 1928
between 15.30 and 16.00, C.Stormer heard an
echo 'beyond any
doubt'; the signals lasted for 1,5- 2 seconds on
waves 31,4 meters long.

Stormer and Hals recorded the intervals between the
signal and the mysterious echo:
1) 15, 9, 4, 8, 13, 8, 12, 10, 9, 5, 8, 7, 6
2) 12, 14, 14, 12, 8
3) 12, 5, 8
4) 12, 8, 5, 14, 14, 15, 12, 7, 5.5, 13, 8, 8, 8, 13,

5) 9

Atmospheric disturbances were insignificant at that
The frequency of echoes was equal to that of the main
signal. C.Stormer explained the nature of echoes by
reflection of radio waves from layers of particles
by the Sun. But!

The Professor of the Stenford Electrotechnical
R.Bracewell suggested possibility of informational
communication through space probes between more or less
developed civilisations in space. From that point of
the information about decoding of Stormer series can be
found in following journals:

'Smena' No.2 Moscow 1966 , 'Astronautics and
No.5 USA 1973, 'Technika Molodezi' No.4 1974 and No.5
Moscow, etc.

The author of this work offers the following decoding:
the numbers in the series be replaced for chemical
of elements with corresponding nuclear charges:
1) P F Be O Al O Mg Ne F B O N C
2) Mg Si Si Mg O
3) Mg B O
4) Mg O B Si Si P Mg N B B Al O O O Al F Ne N Si C F B
5) F

It is easy to see that the second series is repeated
at the
beginning of the forth series with the only difference
in the forth series silicon is alloyed with boron and
phosphorus, i.e. 'p-n transition' of a diode is
created. The
third series describes receipt of pure boron through
on boron anhydrite by magnesium:
B2O3 and Mg = B ...

The author of the above hypothesis wrote his degree
paper on
silicon carbide light-emitting diode, that is why the
ending of the forth series is the most simple- it is a
modern light-emitting diode. Silicon carbide is
alloyed with
nitrogen and boron with 'some participation' of
Approximately the same way diamond is alloyed with
participation of fluorine in laboratories of 'other
civilisations', as can be seen at the ending of the
series. In the middle of the forth series corundum,
the base
of ruby, is also alloyed with boron, nitrogen and
In the fifth series simply fluorine is educed as a
but very aggressive gas. Inert neon seems to divide
optoelectronic devices.

In conclusion, some repeated applications should be
fluorine favours in a way either diffusion of boron or
electronic processes in forbidden zones of diamond,
carbamide; for some reason magnesium contacts are used.

In 1928 semi-conductor devices were not in use on
It was made in Leningrad,1978.
Sincerely yours,
H.G Filipenka.

[Edited to remove personal details]


Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
A visitor there, he was having some fun
On little planet -- the third from the sun.



May 29, 2004
About the metallic bond and about the conductivity

Dear Sirs! Please see this paper.

Machine translation from-

Why have decided to connect occurrence of superconductivity with thermal
fluctuations of atoms of a lattice? Because materials of isotopes of an
element had different temperatures of transition in a superconducting
condition. Certainly such dependence is but it is insignificant.
Superconductivity does not depend on type of a lattice. Around of a
superconductor Nb in the table of elements it is a lot of conductors, but
not over. And thermal fluctuations of their atoms practically same. Why
superconductivity is not found out in other metals?
Thermal fluctuations of atoms not the main mechanism of superconductivity!

Authors BKS approve, that everyone participates in superconductivity
ten-thousand электрон, and according to the theory of a firm body everyone
participates in simple conductivity from one up to approximately three
electrons from atom either roughly the tenth or the 100-th электрон.
Nevertheless currents of superconductivity there are more than currents of
usual conductivity!

Conductivity certainly depends on temperature. But at copper, silver for
some reason at the lowest temperatures superconductivity is not observed,
and at a conductor Nb which spends much worse copper and
silver-superconductivity is. There is it and at heavier lead with type of a
crystal lattice of copper. Means not thermal fluctuations main here, and
any processes in a zone of conductivity.
For their consideration it is necessary to know number electrons, given by
each atom of a lattice in a zone of conductivity.

Something occurs with electrons in a zone of conductivity! The problem is

The zone of conductivity is represented to me, as a surface of cell
Wigner-Zeits which settles down between atoms of a crystal lattice. And it
is more electron than conductivity also there is no place to be, as soon as
on this surface. At transition in a superconducting condition in a zone of
conductivity электроны should form collective or to become dependent from
each other.
The number electrons given by atom means in a zone of conductivity should
be significant in comparison with copper, nickel or silver, which not
superconductors. The number electrons conductivity in metals-elements is
resulted in work-http: //
In english please see

or -

At vanadium, Nb and tantalum on 5 electrons conductivity on atom and
accordingly temperatures of transitions Ts=5,30... 9,26 and 4,48K. At Hf,
the titan and zirconium on 3 electrons, and Ts=0,09... 0,39 and 0,65K. We
shall look the table of elements on the right-there lead, Sn-on 4-5
electrons and aluminium, Ga, In, waists at which on 2-3 electrons, and
Ts=1,196... 1,091...3,40...2,39K accordingly. At lead and tin Ts=7,19 and
3,72K accordingly. As was to be shown.
As a zone of conductivity a surface, and electrons possess backs (spin) on
mine the organization electrons conductivity in collective goes by means of
interaction through backs (spin).

I here wish to tell, that electrons conductivity certainly are somehow
united, but only not as in BCS when they start to make advances on distance
in some thousand atoms between which are even more electrons and after that
"couple". Clearly and that the number of power levels in a zone of
conductivity is not equal to number electrons to conductivity (as the
quantum mechanics), and makes size equal to number electrons conductivity
from atom of a crystal lattice, i.e. 1-5 or hardly it is more.

Electrons conductivity bring the low contribution to a thermal capacity of
metal (law Diulonge-Pti). Theoretical calculation on model Drude shows,
that the contribution electrons in a thermal capacity should be
significant. Presumably, in real space, the zone of conductivity should is
in area of a surface of cell Wigner-Zeits. Roughly, it reminds herself beer
Therefore electrons conductivity bring the low contribution to a thermal
capacity of metal since they as a matter of fact are in space bidimentional
with a complex surface. Here mistake Drude. And periodicity for electron
conductivity in a crystal is connected not so much from a constant lattice,
how many with stereometry hybrid (valent) орбиталей nuclear skeletons. Look
осциляции in experiences de-Haas-van-Alfen on research of a surface of

Sincerely,Henadzi Filipenka


May 29, 2004
There were many messages on the magnetic phenomena accompanying superconductivity. Therefore it is represented interesting to arrange between two superconductors a thin layer from ferromagnetic (the film of iron for example) and to analyse result.
Not open for further replies.