• Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!

Omitting 'that'.

Status
Not open for further replies.
U

Unregistered

Guest
I am totally confused as to when and where I can omit 'that' in a clause.
Can anyone help (preferably in the simplest of terms)?
 

Snowcake

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
German
Home Country
Germany
Current Location
Germany
Hello,


All you have to do when it comes to decide "that" yes or no is to know the subject and the object of a sentence.

You must use that when it refers to the subject of a sentence.

Example:

Where are the eggs that were in the basket?

Eggs is the subject. You cannot say:

Where are the eggs were in the basket? ---> wrong

You can leave out that when it refers to the object of a sentence.

Example:

The car (that) I wanted to buy was red.

In this example you can use that but it is not necessary.

"I" is the subject and "car" is the object.


Hope that helps,
Snowcake
 

David L.

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Member Type
Other
Not quite.
Where are the eggs that were in the basket?
= Where are the eggs? The eggs were in the basket.
Here, 'that' is being used instead of 'eggs' and hence can't be omitted.

The car (that) I wanted to buy was red.
The car was red. I wanted to buy the car.
In this example, 'that' is a conjunction and can be omitted.
 

Snowcake

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
German
Home Country
Germany
Current Location
Germany
Hi David,

I hope you can give me a clue since I am a bit confused now.

This is what I meant:

The eggs were in the basket. But they aren't there anymore. They are away and I'm looking for them.

This is the example my grammar book gives:

Where is the cheese that was in the fridge.

"that" means in this case: The chees was in the fridge. that (=the cheese) is subject.

So you cannot say:

Where is the cheese was in the fridge?

Regards
Snowcake
 
Last edited:

banderas

Key Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
UK
Not quite.
Where are the eggs that were in the basket?
= Where are the eggs? The eggs were in the basket.
Here, 'that' is being used instead of 'eggs' and hence can't be omitted.

The car (that) I wanted to buy was red.
The car was red. I wanted to buy the car.
In this example, 'that' is a conjunction and can be omitted.

David, Would you omit "that" in these sentences, then?

1."The boss said yesterday that production in this department was down fifty percent."
2."Our annual report revealed that some losses sustained by this department in the third quarter of last year were worse than previously thought."
If so, why? If not why?
 

David L.

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Member Type
Other
What did the boss say?
He said production was down.
The boss said (that) production was down.
 

Snowcake

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
German
Home Country
Germany
Current Location
Germany
Hi David,

sorry, I'm a bit slow on the uptake today.

One can say:

Where are the eggs in the basket.

I think I got that.

However, provided that I don't want to split up the sentence and I want to make a relative clause, then:

Where are the eggs that were in the basket? you cannot say

Where are the eggs were in the basket?

You can say "Where are the eggs in the basket?

But then it is not a relative clause.

Are we talking at cross-purposes?

Sorry if I am completely on the wrong track. :-?

Could you shed light on the really confusing matter?
I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Snowcake
 

David L.

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Member Type
Other
The difference is, when is 'that' being used as a pronoun, and when as a conjunction.
The eggs that were in the basket. - 'that' is being used as a pronoun.
The boss said production is down/the boss said that production is down.
Here, 'that' is being used as a conjunction.
 

naomimalan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Yes, I think you've been talking at cross purposes. Snowcake, your sentences show (that!) you are talking about relative pronouns, not conjunctions. So let’s just forget about sentences with conjunctions for the moment and concentrate on the example (that) Snowcake has given us from her grammar book:

Where is the cheese that was in the fridge?

As you say, Snowcake, the relative pronoun “that” in the above sentence is in subject position in the relative clause (that was in the fridge).

If the relative pronoun “that” is in subject position, you shoud notleave it out . So you should not say: *Where is the cheese was in the fridge? It would be ungrammatical in standard English.

However, if the relative pronoun (in this case “that) is in object position, then you can leave it out, for example, in the following sentence:

Where is the cheese (that) I put in the fridge?
 
Last edited:

Karen D

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
David, "that" is not a conjunction in your first example. To text for this, see if "which" could be substituted. If it can, you have a relative "that" not a conjunction.

The car (that/which) I wanted to buy...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top