Participal

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anonymous

Guest
Dear friends,

I'm a new one in the message board. May I have someone answer my question:

The young man, jogging in the morning every day, is very strong. (right?)

The young man, jogging every morning, is very strong.
(right?)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Those sentences are okay. Is there some context you want to put them into?

:)
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
The second is better than the first. ;-)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
tdol said:
The second is better than the first. ;-)

That is true.

:wink:
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
(I'm interested in sentence structure.) :lol:

How about these another two sentences as follows:

1. The young man, who jogs in the morning every day, is very strong. (right?)

2. The young man, who is jogging in the morning every day, is very strong. (right?)
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Hi, Jesse , and welcome. First, while not wrong, the 'in the morning every day' phrase doesn't sound very natural- just use every morning. The present simple makes more sense as I see no need for the progressive with this repeated action.

Of the four versions, I'd use:
The young man, who jogs every morning , is very strong.

;-)
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
(I'm surprised at the answering speed :D . However, thanks a lot)

The young man, jogging every morning, is very strong.

"jogging every morning" is an adverbal clause, right? How do we often interprete this sentence in English?
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
Also, how about the next sentence as follows:

My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

If "breaking down every other week" functions as an adverbal clause, how do we often interprete this sentence in English?

And, how about this one:

My old car, which breaks down every other week, won’t last much longer.

Are the two sentences equal?
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Jesse Huang said:
Also, how about the next sentence as follows:

My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

If "breaking down every other week" functions as an adverbal clause, how do we often interprete this sentence in English?

And, how about this one:

My old car, which breaks down every other week, won’t last much longer.

Are the two sentences equal?

The participle is a way of removing the relative clause. We often doit to cut down on the number of full verbs in the sentence. The meaning is the same. ;-)
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

Q1: "breaking down every other week" functions as adjective clause?

Q2: Can this sentence be interpreted as:

Because it breaks down every other week, my old car won’t last much longer.

Q3: What is the meaning of full verbs? Please give me some examples.
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I prefer:
  • My old car, which breaks down every other week, won’t last much longer.
I think that is the most natural and easiest to understand.

I am not at all sure what a "full verb" is as I have never encountered that term before. Probably Tdol can provide additional help.

:)
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
What I meant was we replace relative pronoun + main verbs with a present or a past participle, which carries the idea of the verb. ;-0
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
Here is my another question:

My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

How do we interprete this sentence when we see it?

(a)Because it breaks down every other week, my old car won’t last much longer.

or

(b)My old car, which breaks down every other week, won’t last much longer.

(In my opinion, they're somewhat different)
 

Dianelys

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
participial

Hi, Jesse.

1. The young man, jogging every morning, is very strong.
2. My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

‘jogging every morning’ and ‘breaking down every other week’ are not (adverbial) clauses*. They are alternatives to relative clauses.

*In traditional grammar, a clause has its own subject and a finite verb (= full verb/a verb having tense). A clause can be defined as a grammatical unit operating at a level lower than a sentence but higher than a phrase.

Alternatives to relative clauses

Sometimes, instead of a complete relative clause, we use shorter phrases in order to describe the subject in the main clause or to provide more information. These are like simplified forms of relative clauses.

In your examples,’ jogging’ and’ breaking (down )’ appear in their present participle form without a relative pronoun.


3. Here is another question:

My old car, breaking down every other week, won’t last much longer.

How do we interprete this sentence when we see it?

(a) Because it breaks down every other week, my old car won’t last much longer.
This is an adverbial clause of reason, that answers the question: Why do you think it won’t last much longer?
In your sentence, ’breaking down every other week’ is just additional information about your car, and not necessarily the cause of its final breakdown.
or

(b)My old car, which breaks down every other week, won’t last much longer.
This is a real relative clause and means the same as its alternative (breaking down….). It’s a question of style.
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
(Thanks for the answer, but I still have a question.)

My old car, breaking every other week, won’t last much longer.

Breaking every other week, my old car won’t last much longer.

Do the sentences above share the same meaning?
 

Dianelys

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
participial & full verbs

Q3: What is the meaning of full verbs? Please give me some examples

full verb: another term for lexical verb = a verb of a class that contains all verbs except MODAL and PRIMARY (auxiliary) verbs. Full verbs (or lexical verbs) constitute the majority of verbs. Formally they use auxiliary verbs in the formation of questions and negatives. Full verbs function as main verbs*, never as auxiliaries, and they can function alone.
EXAMPLES:
1. They seldom watch TV. - watch alone = present simple
2. They are watching TV right now. - are (auxiliary) + watching (main verb in present participle) = present continuous or progressive
3. Do you often watch TV? - do (auxiliary) + watch (main verb) = interrogative form of present simple
4. She watched TV last night. – watched (main verb, alone – in past simple)
5. I have not watched TV since last Friday. – have (auxiliary) + watched (main verb in past participle) = present perfect

*main verb is a verb functioning as the head of a verb phrase
In the verb phrases below, ‘watch’ is the main verb.It is used in different forms with auxiliaries like ‘be’, ‘have’ or a modal auxiliary: ‘will’.
is watching
was watching
has watched
has been watching
will watch
will be watching
will have watched, etc.
 

Dianelys

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Jesse Huang said:
(Thanks for the answer, but I still have a question.)

My old car, breaking every other week, won’t last much longer.

Breaking every other week, my old car won’t last much longer.

Do the sentences above share the same meaning?

Not really. They have different meanings.

‘Breaking down every other week’, (…) is an –ing clause that explains why your old car won’t last much longer.
It can be replaced by clauses of reason:
1. As my old car breaks down every other week, it won’t last much longer.
2. Since my old car……………………………….., “
3. My old car won’t last much longer because it breaks down every other week.

As you can see, the position of this –ing construction can change the meaning.
 
J

Jesse Huang

Guest
Also, another question:(Just to make sure if I understand)

The plan, which replaces an earlier contentious plan to sell IMF gold on the oprn-market, was welcomed by US Treasury secretary.

The plan, replacing an earlier contentious plan to sell IMF gold on the oprn-market, was welcomed by US Treasury secretary.

They share the same meanings, right?
 

Dianelys

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Participle

Jesse Huang said:
Also, another question:(Just to make sure if I understand)

The plan, which replaces an earlier contentious plan to sell IMF gold on the oprn-market, was welcomed by US Treasury secretary.

The plan, replacing an earlier contentious plan to sell IMF gold on the oprn-market, was welcomed by US Treasury secretary.

They share the same meanings, right?

Yes, they do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top