Peter smashed an antique chair into

Bassim

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bosnian
Home Country
Bosnia Herzegovina
Current Location
Sweden
I am wondering if my sentences are grammatically correct.

Peter smashed an antique chair into the door, for which his wife never forgave him. The chair was handed down to her after her mother's death, and had immense value for her. She planned to bequeath it to their daughter.
 

Lynxear

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
"Peter smashed an antique chair into the door, for which his wife never forgave him. The chair was handed down to her after her mother's death, and had immense value for her. She planned to bequeath it to their daughter."

The comma should be removed in the second sentence since these are not two independent clauses.

In the last sentence I would use the past perfect tense for to plan. The reason is that "had planned" indicates there was a plan in the past. However, now that is impossible because the chair is smashed.

Peter smashed an antique chair into the door, for which his wife never forgave him. The chair was handed down to her after her mother's death and had immense value for her. She had planned to bequeath it to their daughter.
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I'd use which his wife never forgave orwhich his wife never forgave him for. ​Your version is not wrong, but it sounds a bit strained to me.
 
Top