please correct me

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zoe2008

Key Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
China
My reply was correct on last Friday.
1. Because we did not receive the quantity allocation for this PO MCHK2008N0038 of total 4500pcs, so I suggest George to allocated this by one PO instead of cross to two PO, and he agreed.
2. The PO no. is MCCH2008N0057, but not 56, Viola was make the typo.
 

Anglika

No Longer With Us
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Member Type
Other
My reply was correct on last Friday.last Friday was correct.
1. Because we did not receive the quantity allocation on PO MCHK2008N0038 for a total 4500 pcs, so I suggest George to allocated this by one PO instead of cross to two PO I suggested to George that he allocate both these to one PO instead of two, and he agreed.
2. The PO no. is MCCH2008N0057, not 56. Viola made a typo.

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top