Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!
I'd use the first because the normal pattern is to use the past tense would 'would' in such sentences. However, I wouldn't go so far as to say the second is impossible, but I'd play safe. ;-)
I'd use the first because the normal pattern is to use the past tense would 'would' in such sentences. However, I wouldn't go so far as to say the second is impossible, but I'd play safe. ;-)
I agree with TDOL. In form, this is a second conditional. These conditionals use the past tense in the "if" clause, and the present conditional "would" + "base verb form" in the result clause. The second variation would be a mixed conditional, which can be grammatical, but is less common. :wink: