puzzled

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
RonBee said:
Re:
  • If you touch a hot stove you will get burned.
Zero conditional?

:)

No, that's a first conditional. It has the future tense in the result clause. Zero conditionals that deal with known facts can also be stated as first conditionals.

If you touch a hot stove, you get burned.
If you touch a hot stove, you will get burned.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
RonBee said:
MikeNewYork said:
RonBee said:
Re:
  • After tobacco is lit it burns.
Zero conditional?

:)

Hmmm. Leave it to you to ask a question I can't answer. I am used to zero conditionals beginning with "if" or "when". My instinct is to say no to an "after" sentence, but I can't find a good reason. It is not much different from "when". :?

  • When tobacco is lit, it burns.
It means the same thing, eh?

:)

Yes it does. Hence, my stammering. :?
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
MikeNewYork said:
RonBee said:
Re:
  • If you touch a hot stove you will get burned.
Zero conditional?

:)

No, that's a first conditional. It has the future tense in the result clause. Zero conditionals that deal with known facts can also be stated as first conditionals.

If you touch a hot stove, you get burned.
If you touch a hot stove, you will get burned.

Ah, that's interesting. The two statements mean the same thing, but the way it is expressed makes it either a zero conditional or a first conditional.

Hopefully, I will remember what I have learned so far.

:)
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Ah, that's interesting. The two statements mean the same thing, but the way it is expressed makes it either a zero conditional or a first conditional.

Hopefully, I will remember what I have learned so far.

:)

Of course you will! 8)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
First conditional:
  • If you touch a hot stove you will get burned.
How about:
  • If you study hard you can get good grades.
First conditional? Or should it be:
  • If you study hard you will get good grades.
Definitely a first conditional, right?


:)
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
RonBee said:
First conditional:
  • If you touch a hot stove you will get burned.
How about:
  • If you study hard you can get good grades.
First conditional? Or should it be:
  • If you study hard you will get good grades.
Definitely a first conditional, right?


:)

The second is definitely a first conditional. I think the first would qualify also, but I'm not sure of the definition as it applies to other modals. :wink:
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
How about:
  • If I choose to work, I will work.
A first conditional, right?

:)
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
RonBee said:
How about:
  • If I choose to work, I will work.
A first conditional, right?

:)

Yes, indeed. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top