reading question again

Status
Not open for further replies.

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
The sentences:

We do not know how to express ouselves because we have often had to do so in the same or similar ways in the past. It is very rare that what we wish to express now is exactly the same as something we have wanted to say previously. There is usually some difference of emphasis, of conviction or of situation at the very least. In other words, the demands that we want to place on language are virtually limitless.

About "at the very least", what part of the sentence does it modify? My text says it is:

There is usually some difference of emphasis, of conviction or of situation at the very least.

But IMO it is:

There is usually some difference of emphasis, of conviction or of situation at the very least.

What do you think, teachers?
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
To get to your interpretation, I think you'd need a comma. I could easilybe wrong, though. ;-)
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
tdol said:
To get to your interpretation, I think you'd need a comma.

Where should the comma be placed, in front of "or of situation" or "at the very least"?
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
It would probably be beter to move it:

of conviction or, at the very least, of situation.

That way, there would be no ambigiuiy. ;-)
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
tdol said:
It would probably be beter to move it:

of conviction or, at the very least, of situation.

That way, there would be no ambigiuiy. ;-)

Yes. I know if "at the very least" were in that position, there would be no ambiguity. But you said:

tdol said:
To get to your interpretation, I think you'd need a comma.

So, I'm just wondering where the comma should be.
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
You could argue for either, though before 'at' would make more sense to me. ;-)
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
OK. Thank you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top