Taka
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2004
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- Japanese
- Home Country
- Japan
- Current Location
- Japan
The sentences:
In much of Latin America it was long thought that a man could not possibly suppress the strong urges that took possession of him every time he was alone with a woman. In the eyes of Latinos, women were considered unable to resist a man. The result was that the patterns of association contained safeguards and protecitive measures. Americans who were going to Latain america had to be cautioned that if they let themselves get into a situation with a member of the opposite sex where something could have happened, it would be no use to tell that it had not. The Latin response would be, "After all, you're a man, aren't you? She's a woman isn't she?"
Why safeguards and protecitve measures? I mean, it is not safe for a woman, is it?
Or does safeguards and protecitve measures has some sort of connotation, like "an easy excuse for a man" or something?
In much of Latin America it was long thought that a man could not possibly suppress the strong urges that took possession of him every time he was alone with a woman. In the eyes of Latinos, women were considered unable to resist a man. The result was that the patterns of association contained safeguards and protecitive measures. Americans who were going to Latain america had to be cautioned that if they let themselves get into a situation with a member of the opposite sex where something could have happened, it would be no use to tell that it had not. The Latin response would be, "After all, you're a man, aren't you? She's a woman isn't she?"
Why safeguards and protecitve measures? I mean, it is not safe for a woman, is it?
Or does safeguards and protecitve measures has some sort of connotation, like "an easy excuse for a man" or something?