U
Unregistered
Guest
I am sometimes quite unsure how I am supposed to deal with semicolons and colons. I have a decent understanding of when a semicolon should be used, but my confusion is about what I can do with the portion that comes after the semicolon. The sentence below illustrates my confusion because I am not sure if it is a grammatically correct sentence.
---The basis of Leibniz's charge is twofold; miracles need to remain special and sacred and predictions about the world have to be possible.---
The portion after the semicolon contains two sentences combined with a conjuction. I know this is usually wrong, but the word "twofold" implies that two clauses have to follow. Any feed back on semicolons in general would be appreciated. I also have questions about the colon use, and I will post sentences below.
---These are: Descartes' interactionism, Malebranche's occasionalism, and Leibniz's pre-established harmony.---
---The two events compliment each other through their relation in time, and this leads to correlation. This is what we mean by harmony: inter-substantially and intra-substantially.
Any help would be great.
Thanks,
Hal
---The basis of Leibniz's charge is twofold; miracles need to remain special and sacred and predictions about the world have to be possible.---
The portion after the semicolon contains two sentences combined with a conjuction. I know this is usually wrong, but the word "twofold" implies that two clauses have to follow. Any feed back on semicolons in general would be appreciated. I also have questions about the colon use, and I will post sentences below.
---These are: Descartes' interactionism, Malebranche's occasionalism, and Leibniz's pre-established harmony.---
---The two events compliment each other through their relation in time, and this leads to correlation. This is what we mean by harmony: inter-substantially and intra-substantially.
Any help would be great.
Thanks,
Hal