That security cameras should be removed from public places

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anonymous

Guest
i believe that people are not affected by cameras in public places. what about the petrol station cameras? people are not bothered by them . People like me.
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
Re: That security cameras should be removed from public plac

Noj Pn said:
i believe that people are not affected by cameras in public places. what about the petrol station cameras? people are not bothered by them . People like me.

Not too long ago, in the USA, a child was abducted on her way home from a friend's house, and later murdered. The man who murdered her was shortly caught and jailed, thanks to an eyewitness: a gas station camera. 8)
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Not too long ago, in the USA, a man was accosted on his way home from a friend's house, and later mugged. The man who accosted him was shortly shot dead, thanks to a wallet saver: a 9mm handgun.

FRC
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
As long as there are strict controls over the cameras and the use of film taken, they don't bother me. When CCTV footage gets onto TV, then I start getting worried. When CCTV helps the police or protects people, then I am allin favour of it. ;-)
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
The whole problem is that you don't know who will have access to the tapes and what they will do with them.

FRC
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
Francois said:
Not too long ago, in the USA, a man was accosted on his way home from a friend's house, and later mugged. The man who accosted him was shortly shot dead, thanks to a wallet saver: a 9mm handgun.

FRC

:shock: Neither amusing nor of interest. :(
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
One can always come up with a story showing that X or Y has been a good thing in a precise context. This cannot lead to any logical conclusion per se, and doesn't really address the problem. I mean, every pro-X and pro-Y has a story to tell. Sorry for the send-up, I didn't mean to bother you.

FRC
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
Francois said:
One can always come up with a story showing that X or Y has been a good thing in a precise context. This cannot lead to any logical conclusion per se, and doesn't really address the problem. I mean, every pro-X and pro-Y has a story to tell. Sorry for the send-up, I didn't mean to bother you.

FRC

Please re-read the original post (i.e., cameras in public places: for or against? Why?). :D
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
1) Can cameras be useful to prosecute people? Yes
2) Can cameras infringe on personal privacy? Yes
So the question is about the implications of 1) and 2), and can both be gained or preserved to an acceptable level. That's what Tdol dealt with, I think. I didn't mean that your example was pointless or whatever, just that 2) must be taken into account to get the full picture.

FRC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top