The President and his ministers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bassim

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bosnian
Home Country
Bosnia Herzegovina
Current Location
Sweden
Please, would you take a look at my sentence and correct it. I am not sure if my punctuation is correct.

1.The President and his ministers have become a clique, which has created its own rules and regulations, which have more to do with manipulation than just politics.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
I cannot say there is anything wrong with it, although my own preference would be to omit both commas.
 
Last edited:

billmcd

Key Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Please, would you take a look at my sentence and correct it. I am not sure if my punctuation is correct.

1.The President and his ministers have become a clique, which has created its own rules and regulations, which have more to do with manipulation than just politics.

Well, as I have mentioned previously in response to other posts, I am a "comma conservative", and I use, hopefully, only when they contribute to understanding on the part of the reader. I also believe that, at birth, we are granted a predetermined limit on the use of commas, and I have a feeling that I am way over my limit. But on a more serious note, (there's another one) I think your first comma is OK, but I would delete the second and replace "which" with "that".
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I am not sure if my punctuation is correct.

With the first, do you see it as essential information defining the clique or additional stuff added out of interest?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top