to/for

Status
Not open for further replies.

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Are these sentences all correct:

1-You have damaged the car to take us out of here.
2-You have damaged the car to get out of here in.
3-You have damaged the car in which we could get out of here.
4-You have damaged the car for getting out of here.

5-Send the medication to cure me via mail.
6-You have forgotten to send the medication to cure me.
7-You have forgotten to send the medication for curing me.
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Thanks Cas.

I can't see why they are wrong though, if one considers that the clauses postmodify the noun.


This is the car to take you there.
The car (which was) to take you there was damaged by him.
He damaged the car (which was) to take you there.
 
Last edited:

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
Independent Clause: You have damaged the car.

Modification
Question: Which car?
Answer: The car that was (supposed) to take us out of here.

Relative Clause: that was (supposed) to take us out of here.

EX: You have damaged the car that was (supposed) to take us out of here.

Note, 'that' functions as the subject, and 'was (supposed to take)' functions as the verb'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top