too expensive II

Status
Not open for further replies.

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
-With this special card, you can stay three more days here.

1-For three more days, that card is too expensive.
2-For staying three more days, that card is too expensive.

3-That card is too expensive for staying three more days.
4-That card is too expensive for three more days.

Which of the above sentences is correct (they are said in response to the very first, numberless sentence).
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Thanks again.
Why are 2 and 3 wrong? One thinks that it is the card that does the staying?
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
I think I pushed the button twice or something. Just ignore this post if you see it (and even if you don't).
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
'Staying'is clearly the problem, but I'm not sure that it does imply that the card will be occupying the room.;-)
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
What do you think of this explanation:

"That knife is too dull for cutting meat."
means: "That knife is so dull that one can't cut meat with it."

"That card is too expensive for staying three more days."
should mean:
"That card is so expensive that one can't stay three more days with it." (this is of-course nonsense.)
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Why not "That knife is too dull to cut meat"?
- too X for + object
- too X to + verb
But this is not the pb here I think, as
"That card is too expensive to stay three more days" sounds still weird (teachers to confirm).

FRC
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
navi tasan said:
Thanks again.
Why are 2 and 3 wrong? One thinks that it is the card that does the staying?

It has to do with the meaning of the word "stay".

A. For a three day stay, the card is too expensive. (non-verbal noun)
B. The card is too expensive for a three day stay.

The card is too expensive to stay for three days. (non-finite verb)
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
Francois said:
Why not "That knife is too dull to cut meat"?
- too X for + object
- too X to + verb
But this is not the pb here I think, as
"That card is too expensive to stay three more days" sounds still weird (teachers to confirm).

FRC

These boots are made for walking. (OK)
This knife is made for cutting meat. (OK)
That card is too expensive to stay three more days. (OK)

This leash is made for staying. (Semi-OK)
This leash is made to make dogs stay. (OK)
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Thanks François and Cas,

Is there anything wrong with:
1-This knife is too dull for cutting meat.
or:
2-For cutting meat, this knife is too dull.


These boots were made for walking.
(Nancy Sinatra, isn't it?)

That card is too expensive to stay three more days.

This sentence is doubtlessly correct. But does it mean exactly the same as the first sentences?

That card is too expensive to stay three more days (with).

My first sentences are about a "three-day card". It is too expensive for three days. Or, to make things simpler, it is too expensive for what it is.

It seems to me that the new sentence says something else or at least could be used in another context:
We should stay more than three more days with that card. If we don't, it won't be worth it. It is as if it is a "ten-day card" (ten or any figure greater than 3) and one is saying that it is too expensive to be used for a three-day stay. It is as if the card could be used for other things and we have a choice.
Don't stay three more days with that card. That'll come out too expensive.

That's the way I feel about it. I'm saying all this of-course, because I want to see whether I am right or not. I have to admit that the context that I have imagined is a bit weird.
 

Francois

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
We should stay more than three more days with that card. If we don't, it won't be worth it. It is as if it is a "ten-day card" (ten or any figure greater than 3) and one is saying that it is too expensive to be used for a three-day stay. It is as if the card could be used for other things and we have a choice.
Don't stay three more days with that card. That'll come out too expensive.
I agree. Only context can make it clear.

As for the 'too dull to/for', I would say:
- This knife is too dull to cut meat.
- This knife is too sharp for a 4-year-old.
I reckon you can say "too dull for cutting meat", but I still prefer "too dull to", though "It's made for cutting meat" is fine.

FRC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top