Unless

Status
Not open for further replies.

hoangkha

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Hi, teachers!
I have seen the following sentence.
- I would have gone with him(A) to Washington except(B) I had had(C)no time(D).
The key is B and I am wondering whether it should be replaced with UNLESS. I am not sure that it is right because I have been tought that UNLESS is never used with a negative clause in conditionals.
I am confused. Please help.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
Hi, teachers!
I have seen the following sentence.
- I would have gone with him(A) to Washington except(B) I had had(C)no time(D).
The key is B and I am wondering whether it should be replaced with UNLESS. I am not sure that it is right because I have been tought that UNLESS is never used with a negative clause in conditionals.
I am confused. Please help.

That doesn't make any sense to me. What are you supposed to be doing with this text?
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I assume it was identify the error, which I would answer was "had had."
 

Prus

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bosnian
Home Country
Bosnia Herzegovina
Current Location
Australia
Hi, teachers!
I have seen the following sentence.
- I would have gone with him(A) to Washington except(B) I had had(C)no time(D).
The key is B and I am wondering whether it should be replaced with UNLESS. I am not sure that it is right because I have been tought that UNLESS is never used with a negative clause in conditionals.
I am confused. Please help.


You should have wondered about (C) as well, because (C) must be in the simple past tense. Only this is gramatically correct:

I would have gone with him to Washington, except that I had no time.


The comma between the independent clause at the left and the dependent clause at the right is mandatory. Also, it is grammatically incorrect to omit the that from the subordinating conjuction except that.

You would do well to know that something in that construction is omitted. Let's regress from the most verbose version until we reach the above construction.


1. I didn't go with him to Washington, but I would have gone with him to Washington if I had had the time, except that I had no time

2. I would have gone with him to Washington if I had had the time, except that I had no time.

3. I would have gone with him to Washington, except that I had no time.


All three of those sentences have the same meaning, and contain the same amount of it, with only the third sentence having the usual, regular construction.

You also asked about unless, another subordinating conjunction used for expressing conditions. No, you cannot use it in your sentence. Here's the difference between unless and except that:


INDEPENDENT CLAUSE A + UNLESS + DEPENDENT CLAUSE B
= A keeps on holding, and the only way it no longer holds is on the condition that B holds
= "unless" means "but the opposite is the case if"
= "unless" means "except if"

Examples:
I will love her forever unless she betrays me.
Don't come unless I telephone.
The directors have a meeting every Friday, unless there is nothing to discuss.
This dress is definitely black, unless it's indigo.




INDEPENDENT CLAUSE A + EXCEPT THAT + DEPENDENT CLAUSE B
= A almost holds, but it doesn't, because the condition B is met
= "except that" means "were it not true that"

Examples:
I'm just like you, except that I'm much better with kids.
I have nothing to regret, except that I might've unintentionally hurt somebody.
A good time was had by all, except that three kids got into a fight.
Socrates didn't know anything, except that he knew that.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top