was by

Status
Not open for further replies.

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Are these sentences correct:
1-That book was by Dickens.
2-That song was by MacCartney.
3-The assasination was by Oswald.
 

Red5

Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
One and two are certainly correct. Number three is a little odd, but I can't think of a suggestion for it at this time. :-(
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
navi tasan said:
Are these sentences correct:
1-That book was by Dickens.
2-That song was by MacCartney.
3-The assassination was by Oswald.

I believe they're all fine. 3- sounds odd because of its position in the string. 'assassination' is placed after 'book' and 'song'. The latter two refers to objects (i.e. book, song), whereas the former denotes an act (assissinate). Furthermore, 3- may be awkward for some readers because of the controversy surrounding Oswald. Some believe he was a "patsy"; that he did not commit the assassination.

:D
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I would say, "The assassination was committed by Oswald." The original sentence seems a little odd to me. An assassination is an act and not the kind of thing that is thought of as produced by somebody, as a play, a book or a movie would be.

:)
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I'm still not too happy with 'commit' for an assasination. How about 'Oswald was the assassin'? ;-)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
tdol said:
I'm still not too happy with 'commit' for an assasination. How about 'Oswald was the assassin'? ;-)

What's wrong with commit there? We use commit with murder, and a murder is an assassination. Also, there is nothing wrong with "Oswald was the assassination", but it does change the form of the sentence.
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Commit works with murder, but sounds strange to me with assassination. ;-)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
By the way, I meant to say than an assassination is a murder. Of course, it is not necessarily true the other way around.

:wink:
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Some assasinations are possibly not. (Not this one) ;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top