We need to breath in fresh air where there is no trail of pollution.

[tufguy]

We need to breath in fresh air where there is no trail of pollution.

Could you please check my sentence?

 

[Amelot]

You meant "breathe". Other than that, it strikes me as an example of a perfectly correct sentence that does not say what the writer thinks it does. It sounds inadvertently poetical and abstruse.

I am not a teacher.

 

[GoesStation]

You want some word other than trail​ there, Tufguy. Fix the verb and change that word and you can have a good sentence.

 

[tufguy]

You want some word other than trail​ there, Tufguy. Fix the verb and change that word and you can have a good sentence.

We need to breathe in fresh air where there is no sign of pollution.

 

[GoesStation]

We need to breathe in fresh air where there is no sign of pollution.

That's OK.

Thanks for writing simpler sentences, Tufguy.

 

[teechar]

In what context would you use that sentence, tufguy?

 

[GoesStation]

You really don't need the "in". Breathing includes inhaling and exhaling. However, it's acceptable as it is.

I can't guess what the phrase trail of pollution is supposed to mean.

 

[Raymott]

I suggest that the intent is "no trace of pollution".

 

[tufguy]

I suggest that the intent is "no trace of pollution".

Yes, you got it.

 

[tufguy]

In what context would you use that sentence, tufguy?

While talking to someone about pollution.