[Grammar] What does "a pattern not alway set in and grow" mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.

on the way

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
The following is a sentence I came across in my reading. “The eighteenth century, for example, produced from various sources a tendency to fix the language into patterns not always set in and grew.”
What baffles me is the expression “not always set in and grew” at the end of the sentence. My acquaintance of English grammar would immediately tell me that this part of the sentence should be past participles functioning as postpositive attributive, but I am puzzled by the awareness that “grew” instead of “grown” is used there, and, moreover, the meaning of “set in” as I know it makes the phrase, at least to me, out of place here. So here I am again, dying for help. Any reply will be much appreciated. Thank you all.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
'... patterns set in and grew' is meaningless. There is some printing error here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top