When Peter met

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bassim

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bosnian
Home Country
Bosnia Herzegovina
Current Location
Sweden
Please, would you take a look at these sentences and correct my grammatical mistakes.

1. When Peter met his neighbours in the street, he was thinking, "I would invite them in for a coffee if his wife was not so chatty."
2. Before he turned eighteen, he had already written three novels, all of which were lavishly praised by the critics.
 

Shoreditch

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Swedish
Home Country
Sweden
Current Location
England
Please, would you take a look at these sentences and correct my grammatical mistakes.

1. When Peter met his neighbours in the street, he was thinking, "I would invite them in for a coffee if his wife was not so chatty."
2. Before he turned eighteen, he had already written three novels, all of which were lavishly praised by the critics.


Not a teacher, not a native

1. It is grammar mistake and not grammatical mistake.
2. I would use "on the street".
3. "Invite" does not require an in: invite [STRIKE]in
[/STRIKE].
4, The tenses are fine. was/were chatty: they both work. I agree with the punctuation.
5. The second sentence is perfect.

You may want to read this:
The use of past perfect in before-clauses is actually quite common. The use of the tenses in such patterns is perplexing because it appears to be a violation of what is normally advised, namely: The action which occurs previously in time is expressed in the past perfect tense, and the action which occurs later in time is expressed in the past tense. This normal situation is shown below. Note how both actions actually took place. The letter really was written and the letter really was mailed.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
"In the street" is fine in BrE.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Not a teacher, not a native

1. It is 'grammar mistake' and not 'grammatical mistake'. No, it isn't. 'Grammatical mistake(s)' is preferable.
2. I would use "on the street". I wouldn't.
3. "Invite" does not require an in: invite [STRIKE]in[/STRIKE]. Its use is preferable in this context.

Rover
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
An American would say "on" the street. When I hear my colleagues say "in" it makes me think of the part where the cars go - hardly the place for a chat. The different prepositions is one thing that I hadn't known about before I started using the forums.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top