You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Word Meaning
- Thread starter jack
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2002
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- British English
- Home Country
- UK
- Current Location
- Japan
1-3 mean much the same.
You could say a word's meaning\meanings, depending on whether the word had one or more meaning. For the plural you could also use singular andplural, though the singular would refer to a group of words that together have a single meaning.;-)
You could say a word's meaning\meanings, depending on whether the word had one or more meaning. For the plural you could also use singular andplural, though the singular would refer to a group of words that together have a single meaning.;-)
What do these mean?
1. The problem is not being dealt with successfully. (Why isn't it 'success' instead of 'successfully'?)
2. The problem is not being dealt with success. (Why isn't it 'success' instead of 'successfully'?)
http://lifestyle.sympatico.msn.ca/Family/Articles/MS+Learn+about+online+bullying.htm
1. The problem is not being dealt with successfully. (Why isn't it 'success' instead of 'successfully'?)
2. The problem is not being dealt with success. (Why isn't it 'success' instead of 'successfully'?)
http://lifestyle.sympatico.msn.ca/Family/Articles/MS+Learn+about+online+bullying.htm
1. The problem is not being dealt with successfully.Only 1. is OK.
2. The problem is not being dealt with success.
Why is #2 wrong?
What do you mean by it answers the question 'how'?It's an adverb. It modifies the verb, and it answers the question "How?".
Passive: The problem is not being dealt with successfully.
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem successfully.
In the active structure, dealing with is a phrasal verb, and its object is the problem. In the passive structure, the object is moved to the front of the clause, the verb is changed from active is not dealing with to passive is not being dealt with, and the adverb successfully stays where it is, at the end of the clause. Since successfully is an adverb (we know this because it (a) ends in -ly, and (b) answers the question, "How?), we can move it around, like this,
EX: The problem is not being successfully dealt with.
EX: The problem is not successfully being dealt with.
Adverb Test
Q: How is the problem not being dealt with?
A: Successfully.
The following sentences are not OK. The verb has two objects: 1) the noun The problem and 2) the noun success:
Passive: The problem is not being dealt with success. (Not OK; Two objects)
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem success. (Not OK; Two objects)
We can repair the above sentences by adding 'of', like this,
Max is not dealing with the problem of success.
The problem of success is not being deal with (by Max).
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem successfully.
In the active structure, dealing with is a phrasal verb, and its object is the problem. In the passive structure, the object is moved to the front of the clause, the verb is changed from active is not dealing with to passive is not being dealt with, and the adverb successfully stays where it is, at the end of the clause. Since successfully is an adverb (we know this because it (a) ends in -ly, and (b) answers the question, "How?), we can move it around, like this,
EX: The problem is not being successfully dealt with.
EX: The problem is not successfully being dealt with.
Adverb Test
Q: How is the problem not being dealt with?
A: Successfully.
The following sentences are not OK. The verb has two objects: 1) the noun The problem and 2) the noun success:
Passive: The problem is not being dealt with success. (Not OK; Two objects)
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem success. (Not OK; Two objects)
We can repair the above sentences by adding 'of', like this,
Max is not dealing with the problem of success.
The problem of success is not being deal with (by Max).
Last edited:
Thanks.
1. The problem is not being dealt with successfully. (I haven't seen this before or maybe I didn't notice it. Is this some advanced english? I find this sentence is hard to understand. I still don't really get it, let me think about it.)
1. The problem is not being dealt with successfully. (I haven't seen this before or maybe I didn't notice it. Is this some advanced english? I find this sentence is hard to understand. I still don't really get it, let me think about it.)
Last edited:
1. Passive: The problem is not being dealt with success. (Not OK; Two objects)
2. Active: Max is not dealing with the problem success. (Not OK; Two objects)
I know #2 is wrong, I see it right away. #1 is a bit harder to see. I think I kind of get it now.
Thanks.
What is the difference between passive and active? Does it matter which one I use?
eg.
Passive: The problem is not being dealt with successfully.
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem successfully.
2. Active: Max is not dealing with the problem success. (Not OK; Two objects)
I know #2 is wrong, I see it right away. #1 is a bit harder to see. I think I kind of get it now.
Thanks.
What is the difference between passive and active? Does it matter which one I use?
eg.
Passive: The problem is not being dealt with successfully.
Active: Max is not dealing with the problem successfully.
Use the passive when (a) you don't know who/what the subject is or (b) you want to emphasize the verb's object. With active sentences, the object always comes third, or there abouts:
Subject+Verb+Object: Max hit Pat.
With passive sentencs, the object comes first,
Object+Verb (+Subject): Pat was hit (by Max).
The subject (i.e., Max) is usually not stated. In fact, if the subject is more important than the object, then the active structure should be used. If the subject is not important however then the passive is used.
My car was hit! (by someone or something. I don't know who or what hit it. Even if I knew who hit it or what hit it, I would still use the passive because I want to place focus on the object of the verb 'hit', 'My car'.
Someone hit my car. (Active)
My car was hit. (Passive)
While it is very important to me that I find out the someone or the something that damaged my car, the most important thing at this very moment is my car, so I use the passive to emphasize that by placing the verb's object ('my car') at the head of the sentence, which is the most prominent position in the sentence; Now 'My car' are the first words people will hear.
The universe was created billions of years ago. (Who created the universe? I don't know. Do you? Use the passive.)
The problem isn't being dealt with. (The important thing here is the problem. The person who isn't dealing with the problem is of no importance to me. By using the passive, I can take focus of the person and place focus on the problem.)
The building was erected in 1942. (The company that erected the building is of no importance to me. I use the passive to emphasize the biulding, which in an active sentence would come third and moreover would require a subject:
Smith Construction erected the building in 1942. (Active)
I don't care about Smith Construction, and I don't want my audience to care about Smith Construction, so I use the passive to get rid of the subject:
The building was erected in 1942. (Passive)
If I want to make a passing remark about the true subject, I will add a by phrase, like this,
The building was erected in 1942 by Smith Construction.
Note, A passive sentence has two subjects: The building is called the grammatical subject, or subject, whereas whatever comes after 'by' (i.e., Smith Construction) is called the semantic subject.
Active: Max (subject) hit Pat (object).
Passive: Pat (subject) was hit by Max (semantic subject).
In short, with passive sentences, the verb's object graduates to a subject, and the subject is demoted: it's either omitted or attached to a 'by' phrase as a passing remark.
Subject+Verb+Object: Max hit Pat.
With passive sentencs, the object comes first,
Object+Verb (+Subject): Pat was hit (by Max).
The subject (i.e., Max) is usually not stated. In fact, if the subject is more important than the object, then the active structure should be used. If the subject is not important however then the passive is used.
My car was hit! (by someone or something. I don't know who or what hit it. Even if I knew who hit it or what hit it, I would still use the passive because I want to place focus on the object of the verb 'hit', 'My car'.
Someone hit my car. (Active)
My car was hit. (Passive)
While it is very important to me that I find out the someone or the something that damaged my car, the most important thing at this very moment is my car, so I use the passive to emphasize that by placing the verb's object ('my car') at the head of the sentence, which is the most prominent position in the sentence; Now 'My car' are the first words people will hear.
The universe was created billions of years ago. (Who created the universe? I don't know. Do you? Use the passive.)
The problem isn't being dealt with. (The important thing here is the problem. The person who isn't dealing with the problem is of no importance to me. By using the passive, I can take focus of the person and place focus on the problem.)
The building was erected in 1942. (The company that erected the building is of no importance to me. I use the passive to emphasize the biulding, which in an active sentence would come third and moreover would require a subject:
Smith Construction erected the building in 1942. (Active)
I don't care about Smith Construction, and I don't want my audience to care about Smith Construction, so I use the passive to get rid of the subject:
The building was erected in 1942. (Passive)
If I want to make a passing remark about the true subject, I will add a by phrase, like this,
The building was erected in 1942 by Smith Construction.
Note, A passive sentence has two subjects: The building is called the grammatical subject, or subject, whereas whatever comes after 'by' (i.e., Smith Construction) is called the semantic subject.
Active: Max (subject) hit Pat (object).
Passive: Pat (subject) was hit by Max (semantic subject).
In short, with passive sentences, the verb's object graduates to a subject, and the subject is demoted: it's either omitted or attached to a 'by' phrase as a passing remark.
Thank you very much for the comprehensive reply. You're simply the best, Casiopea. :cheers: Now, I need to absorb this.
For this picture, how did they know what to use (QuickSave or QuickSaved)?
http://www3.telus.net/superstar/save.jpg
Are these correct? What do these mean?
1. Quick save.
2. Quick saved. (If this is incorrect, how do you know?)
For this picture, how did they know what to use (QuickSave or QuickSaved)?
http://www3.telus.net/superstar/save.jpg
Are these correct? What do these mean?
1. Quick save.
2. Quick saved. (If this is incorrect, how do you know?)
Last edited:
You're welcome.jack said:Thank you very much for the comprehensive reply. You're simply the best, Casiopea. :cheers: Now, I need to absorb this.
QuickSave (Adjective+Noun) OK What kind of save? A quick one.jack said:For this picture, how did they know what to use (QuickSave or QuickSaved)?
QuickSaved (Ajective+Verb) Not OK Try, QuicklySaved (Adverb+Verb) OK
Quick save (It functions as a noun, so it should be a compound: quicksave)
Quick saved Not OK
What does 'nonwarrantied' mean?
1. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarrantied repairs.
2. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarranted repairs. (Is 'warranted' wrong here? Why?)
1. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarrantied repairs.
2. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarranted repairs. (Is 'warranted' wrong here? Why?)
non (i.e., not)jack said:What does 'nonwarrantied' mean?
1. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarrantied repairs.
2. That depends on the machine you buy, the quality of its standard warranty, and the potential cost of nonwarranted repairs. (Is 'warranted' wrong here? Why?)
warrantied (adjective, from the noun warranty)
warrant (noun)
warranted (adjective)
warranty and warrant are two different words.
http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/20031208/printer_roundup-02.html
1. The quality, speed, and ink cost are the same as those of the i450, so refer to the latter to get the results for this i455. (What does 'latter' mean here? What is it referring to?)
1. The quality, speed, and ink cost are the same as those of the i450, so refer to the latter to get the results for this i455. (What does 'latter' mean here? What is it referring to?)
Could someone help me with the post above? Thanks.
Let's say my reservation is for 20 people. Which one do I use?
1. I need to make reservations. (What does this mean? Does 'reservations' mean 'people' since it's plural?)
2. I need to make a reservation. (What does this mean?)
3. Let's say I have to make an reservation for 20 people. (Does this mean one reservation for twenty people?)
4. Let's say I have to make reservations for 20 people. (Does this mean for each person I need to make an reservation?)
6. A light rain was falling. (If this is incorrect, why? #5 is correct?)
Are these correct? What do they mean?
6. There is a light dirzzle tommorow.
7. There is light drizzle tommorow.
8. There are light drizzles tommorow.
9. There is a light rain falling.
10.There is light rain falling.
Let's say my reservation is for 20 people. Which one do I use?
1. I need to make reservations. (What does this mean? Does 'reservations' mean 'people' since it's plural?)
2. I need to make a reservation. (What does this mean?)
3. Let's say I have to make an reservation for 20 people. (Does this mean one reservation for twenty people?)
4. Let's say I have to make reservations for 20 people. (Does this mean for each person I need to make an reservation?)
5. A light drizzle was falling. ('drizzle' is uncountable right? How come 'A' is there?)Drizzle: noun [U, sing.] light fine rain: A light drizzle was falling. http://www1.oup.co.uk/elt/oald/images/xsym.gif The forecast for tomorrow is mist and drizzle.
6. A light rain was falling. (If this is incorrect, why? #5 is correct?)
Are these correct? What do they mean?
6. There is a light dirzzle tommorow.
7. There is light drizzle tommorow.
8. There are light drizzles tommorow.
9. There is a light rain falling.
10.There is light rain falling.
Last edited:
latter means, last one mentioned, and former means, first one mentioned. For example,jack said:http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/20031208/printer_roundup-02.html
1. The quality, speed, and ink cost are the same as those of the i450, so refer to the latter to get the results for this i455. (What does 'latter' mean here? What is it referring to?)
Are shoes and socks all you need? If you don't have the latter (i.e., socks), you can borrow some from me. If you don't have the former (i.e., shoes), you'll have to ask someone else.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.