JiriLindovsky
Junior Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2007
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Czech
- Home Country
- Czech Republic
- Current Location
- Czech Republic
Good afternoon.
Here, in the Czech Republic, there were published 3 nice readers by Jack London. It looks terrific, the text has huge comments, so there is 100% comprehension. BUT, for example:Call of the wild is 100% the same as original text(I had a look at the Internet).
So , do I study archaic language(London wrote this 100 years ago)?
No mater how superb is the comment - style, no matter whether I enjoy the comprehension, isn't this wast of time? And what if I acquire archaic languge habits- big danger.
First I was full of joy, now I am confused about the problem.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jiri Lindovsky
Here, in the Czech Republic, there were published 3 nice readers by Jack London. It looks terrific, the text has huge comments, so there is 100% comprehension. BUT, for example:Call of the wild is 100% the same as original text(I had a look at the Internet).
So , do I study archaic language(London wrote this 100 years ago)?
No mater how superb is the comment - style, no matter whether I enjoy the comprehension, isn't this wast of time? And what if I acquire archaic languge habits- big danger.
First I was full of joy, now I am confused about the problem.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jiri Lindovsky