[Vocabulary] Do these senteces sound good?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dilodi83

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
Do these sentences sound good? If not, could you explain to me what's wrong?

a 1) For three days I was followed by two cops.
2) For three days I was watched by two cops.

b 1) He lived in an old house which would have been demolished the following year.
2) he lived in an old house he would be demolished the following year.

c 1) Everybody would be moved in it as soon as it was ready.
2) Everybody would be housed in it " " " " ".
3) Everybody would be accomodated in it " " " .

d) 1) I went back to the hotel, still being followed by the two cops.
2) I went back to the hotel, still closely followed by the two cops.
 
Do these sentences sound good? If not, could you explain to me what's wrong?

a 1) For three days I was followed by two cops. OK.
2) For three days I was watched by two cops. OK.

b 1) He lived in an old house which would have been demolished the following year. No.
2) He lived in an old house he would be demolished the following year. OK.

c 1) Everybody would be moved into it as soon as it was ready.
2) Everybody would be housed in it " " " " ".
3) Everybody would be accommodated in it " " " . All OK.

d) 1) I went back to the hotel, still being followed by the two cops. OK.
2) I went back to the hotel, still closely followed by the two cops. OK.
Bhai.
 
Could you explain to me why sentence B1 is incorrect, please?;-)
 
Bhai overlooked one slip: .....b2) He lived in an old house he would be demolished the following year.

He lived in an old house that/which would be demolished...
he lived in an old house (that/which) he would [STRIKE]be[/STRIKE] demolish[STRIKE]ed[/STRIKE]...
 
Could you explain to me why sentence B1 is incorrect, please?;-)
b 1) He lived in an old house which would have been demolished the following year.
What do you think it means?
 
b 1) He lived in an old house which would have been demolished the following year.
What do you think it means?

I want to mean that this guy used to live in that house that will probably be demolished in the future. How can I express this concept, not using the future, but using the conditional?
 
I want to mean that this guy used to live in that house that will probably be demolished in the future. How can I express this concept, not using the future, but using the conditional?
I can't think of a way to do that without using "will" or "going to".
"He lived in an old house that, if the planners have their way, will be/is going to be knocked down next year".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top