hard evidence vs hard proof evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
What would be the difference between "hard evidence" and "hard proof evidence"?
 
We don't say "hard proof evidence".

How about this
"No hard proof evidence. That's why he chose a successor, which is near to continue his investigation and find evidence."
 
How about this
"No hard proof evidence. That's why he chose a successor, which is near to continue his investigation and find evidence."

Are you sure that was written by a native speaker? Not only does "hard proof evidence" sound wrong, "which is near to continue..." makes no sense.

Also, "No hard proof evidence" isn't a complete sentence".

This might make sense if it said "He has found no hard evidence. That's why he has chosen a successor, who is here to continue the investigation and find some evidence."
 
Use either He has no proof or He has no hard evidence.

Rover
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top