Quite\Rather 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Modifiers of BETTER:
the film was a lot better than...
lots better ...
a (damned) sight better than ..
far better than...
a little/bit better than..

As for the choice between RATHER and QUITE before 'better', I think it would be worth considering the difference in register (and consequently in meaning) between the two.
 
I'd say far better then I had expected.
 
well, i think that the correct answer is RATHER, because this word is used when something is better than expected, as an intensyfier of the surprise of the persone talking.
 
I voted for "rather" and the posters seem to agree generally, but is "quite" completely wrong? I think it's not when "quite" is stressed.
 
I voted for "rather" and the posters seem to agree generally, but is "quite" completely wrong? I think it's not when "quite" is stressed.
It was quite good; it was quite the best film I have ever seen; but not quite better in this context, in my opinion.

It's acceptable in the sense of 'fully recovered':

A: How are you feeling today? Still weak?
B: No, I am quite better, thank you.
 
How about this?

"Was is better?"
"It was QUITE better!"

This is what I had in mind. I'm not asserting that this is right in any other sense than that it's possible. Is it?
 
This is what I had in mind. I'm not asserting that this is right in any other sense than that it's possible. Is it?
Not for me.

COCA has only two examples of 'quite better', one of them 'I feel quite better', and the other 'quite better off' - which is different.
 
What is COCA? Nothing on Google. Some sort of dictionary? I see it mentioned several times.
 
What is COCA? Nothing on Google. Some sort of dictionary? I see it mentioned several times.
Whoknows, whenever a piece of text is underlined with a dotted line, you can place the cursor over it to see an explanation.

COCA means Corpus of Contemporary American English.
 
Thanks, Birdeen. Do not know where I have been. -:)

I use my iPad2 for this so there is no cursor for underlined words. Will have to try to find this site on my computer.

Also, COCA says I have the wrong resolution to use their site on my iPad. So, I will look it up on my laptop or husband's PC when I want/need to do so. It does seem to be interestingly different than a dictionary, from the little I was able to see.
 
Thanks, Birdeen. Do not know where I have been. -:)

I use my iPad2 for this so there is no cursor for underlined words. Will have to try to find this site on my computer.

Also, COCA says I have the wrong resolution to use their site on my iPad. So, I will look it up on my laptop or husband's PC when I want/need to do so. It does seem to be interestingly different than a dictionary, from the little I was able to see.
Definitely. It's very useful in my opinion. Have a look at other corpora:

CORPORA: 45-425 million words each: free online access
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top