so or because?

Status
Not open for further replies.

嘟嘟嘟嘟

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
About 5000 years ago the ancient Egyptians used to punish criminals by knocking out a front tooth. Unfortunately, honest people that knocked their front out accidentally must have been embarrassed by this ________ they dared not smile as they usually did.

For the blank, is "so" or "because" suitable considering the context? Thanks for help!
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
So would work. Because would not.
 

嘟嘟嘟嘟

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
So would work. Because would not.

What if in the sense that honest people were embarrassed by not daring to smile as they usually did? Does "because"work in that way?
 
Last edited:

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
"Because" still doesn't work.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
嘟嘟嘟嘟;1155652 said:
What if in the sense that honest people were embarrassed by not daring to smile as they usually did? Does "because"work in that way?
Yes, you can make sense of the sentence with "because". But they weren't embarrassed by not daring to smile. They were embarrassed by having lost a tooth.
"They must have been embarrassed because they dared not smile" doesn't mean what you say. It means "We can deduce that they must have been embarrassed, because they dared not smile."

Compare: "He must have been bad because he's sitting in the 'naughty corner'." This doesn't mean that the reason he was bad was because he is sitting in the 'naughty corner'.
 

嘟嘟嘟嘟

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Yes, you can make sense of the sentence with "because". But they weren't embarrassed by not daring to smile. They were embarrassed by having lost a tooth.
"They must have been embarrassed because they dared not smile" doesn't mean what you say. It means "We can deduce that they must have been embarrassed, because they dared not smile."

Compare: "He must have been bad because he's sitting in the 'naughty corner'." This doesn't mean that the reason he was bad was because he is sitting in the 'naughty corner'.

Thanks for your reply, which is reasonable enough for me. Then what about the option "so"? I don't think it proper to use "so" in the context since "must have been" is presented here, which could be the mark of a deduction. What do you think?
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
"So" simply means that the ending follows logically from the beginning. In your sentence, it does.
 

Polyester

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Can I use "with" here?
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
No. That makes no sense at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top