Had developed vs had been developing

Flogger

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
Hello,

I’m wondering why the “had developed” part has not been changed into “ had been developing originally”. The reason I stress on this change is because of the structure of parallelism. What do you think?

The growth of commerce had brought Spaniards into contact with other societies that had developed original had been developing originally and stimulating literary traditions.

I copied it from a GMAT exam.
 

Piscean

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Europe
Current Location
Czech Republic
I can't see where the parallelism is.

You incorrectly changed the adjective 'original' into an adverb.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
What reason could you possibly have for using the present perfect continuous instead of the present perfect simple?
 

Flogger

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
What reason could you possibly have for using the present perfect continuous instead of the present perfect simple?

I thought that “stimulating” was a verb and since it was preceded by “and” then any verbs coming before “and” must adopt an “ing”. That’s why I changed it to the progressive tense. Now I see the problem.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Do you understand the sentence?
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
That's what's important. Focus on understanding what you read.
 
Top