[Grammar] Indirect object or object of preposition?!

Status
Not open for further replies.

nininaz

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
India
Hello,
The principal gave a certificate to whoever had a perfect attendance record.
The bold text acts as noun clause.
Now I want to know the bold text is Indirect object of the verb "gave" or object of preposition of "to"?!or both of them ?!!

And,the next question:
whoever wrote these directions never put a tricycle together.

The bold text acts as a noun clause.whoever is a subordinating conjunction.
and what is the grammatical rule of whoever ?!!

Thanks in advance
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
***** NOT A TEACHER *****


Hello, Nininaz:


I found a sentence that is similar to your second sentence:


"Whoever arrives first is to turn on the lights."

The book says that we should parse "whoever" as an indefinite relative pronoun.

It is "indefinite" because it does NOT have an expressed antecedent.

Its meaning is actually "Anyone who arrives first is to turn on the light." [My note: You could speak that way, but it is more natural to simply use "whoever."]


James

Source: Pence and Emery, A Grammar of Present-Day English (1963).
 
Last edited:

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The sentence is correct. It should be "whoever". The rule is that whom/whomever should be used as the object of a preposition unless it is the subject of a clause. In your sentence, it is the subject if a clause.
 

nininaz

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
India
The sentence is correct. It should be "whoever". The rule is that whom/whomever should be used as the object of a preposition unless it is the subject of a clause. In your sentence, it is the subject if a clause.

Thanks. I want to know why did you use "should " instead of "must" or "have to " in the sentence:The rule is that whom/whomever should be used as the object of a preposition ?!What does 'should' mean in the sentence?!
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
There are very few "musts" in English grammar. People are free to write whatever they wish. But some of it will be incorrect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top