Newspapers risk forfeiting decisions to air controversial or unorthodox ideas

Status
Not open for further replies.

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
it sounds like an outraged mob, but if people don't like the d, so be it.

There's a semantic point to using the noun classifier outrage rather than the adjective descriptor outraged.

An outraged mob is a mob that is outraged.
An outrage mob is the kind of mob whose purpose is to show outrage. This kind of mob has a certain political/ideological agenda in expressing its outrage.
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
There's a semantic point to using the noun classifier outrage rather than the adjective descriptor outraged.
Indeed. The senses have only a little in common. If I may, here are my definitions: An outraged mob is a mob that is outraged. An outrage mob is a mob that wields outrage as a weapon.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
You could argue that outrage (justified or not) was the reason the mob formed in the first place. You could further argue that the term outrage(d) mob is little more than a redundancy.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
No. It behaves like an adjective and consequently does not take the plural form.

Occasionally, they do- women drivers, etc. Though these forms rarely, if ever, have a singular.
 
Last edited:

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Occasionally, they do- women drivers, etc. Though these forms rarely, if ever, have a singular.

Interesting. Woman drivers sounds odd to me.

As Tdol said, they're rarely used in the singular so "woman drivers" should sound odd to you. However, "women drivers", "women doctors" etc are still commonly heard (even though there is no reason to mention the sex of the person).

I have to disagree slightly with Tdol, though. My two examples above are commonly heard in the singular.

John: What is going on with this traffic?
Helen: There's someone at the front of the queue driving really slowly.
John: Probably a woman driver!
Helen: Don't be so sexist!

Paula: Hi, can I make an appointment with one of your doctors please?
Receptionist: Yes, of course. Who are you registered with?
Paula: Well, technically I'm with Dr Benjamin Hodson but I really want to see a lady doctor this time.
Receptionist: Let me see what I can do.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I understood Tdol to be saying that we don't say a women driver. Singularising the head word means having also to singularise the modifier.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
No, we singularise or pluralise both halves of the phrase. So generally it's "woman driver" or "women drivers".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top