Not his witness though is it?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ostap

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
However, another person thought that Depp's lack of eye contact hinted at guilt rather than fear, tweeting, "The way #JohnnyDepp is behaving is so rude and dismissive. Sitting there head down, doodling. If he was innocent he'd be head up, focused, listening to the testimony. Not his witness though is it? Questionable behavior."
newsweek.com


Hello everyone. Could you explain the bolded part to me?
 
Last edited:

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
It's far from clear, and I suspect it doesn't really mean much of anything. It's just a bit of emphasis about Depp's demeanour, and we hardly need to be reminded that the two principals are totally at loggerheads.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I assume the witness being questioned at the time was a witness for the defence (ie it was a witness for Amber Heard's side in the court case). He's more likely to politely concentrate on what's being said when the witness on the stand is on his side.
 

Ostap

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
I assume the witness being questioned at the time was a witness for the defence (ie it was a witness for Amber Heard's side in the court case). He's more likely to politely concentrate on what's being said when the witness on the stand is on his side.
But it was not a witness, it was Amber herself. Johnny didn't look at her during her testimony. The bolded part seems to suggest that he instead was looking at his witness (the on on his side?) I'm still confused.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Well, Amber certainly isn't one of his witnesses! He's the complainant and she's the defendant. I think the writer is suggesting that his lack of eye contact with her during her testimony is indicative of guilt. However, we're all guessing here. Without knowing who was on the stand at the time, I don't think we can say for certain.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
The commenter means to say that Amber Heard, who is testifying on the stand as a witness in her own defence, is not 'his' witness. That just means that she is not on his side.

Amber Heard took the witness stand Wednesday to defend herself during the defamation lawsuit filed against her by ex-husband Johnny Depp, who appeared to avoid looking at her while she was on the stand.
 

Ostap

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
May we know what verb is implied in this sentence: "Not his witness."? How is this sentence connected to the previous one?

He'd be head up, focused, listening to the testimony, not his witness though is it?

I can't even make sence of the tag question "is it?", what does it refer to?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
The logical way of saying it would have been "She's not his witness though, is she?" However, the writer chose to use "it" in place of "she".

It's not his witness on the stand, is it?

It's a rhetorical question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top