diamondcutter
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- China
- Current Location
- China
1.6 Case of the subject NP in gerund-participials
Nominative or plain case in non-complement gerund-participials
Gerund-participials functioning as supplement to a clause may contain a subject; pronouns with a nominative-accusative contrast usually appear in the nominative, with accusative a somewhat marginal alternant in informal style, while other NPs take plain case:
This construction is the only one where we find a nominative subject in a non-finite clause; it belongs to fairly formal style, and hence the informal accusative form in is unlikely: the alternation here is not like that between It’s I/me, where the accusative is much more common.
[64] i They appointed Max, [he/him being the only one who spoke Greek].
ii [His mother being ill,]Max had to withdraw from the expedition.
Source: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 2016 edition, P1191, P1192
I don’t quite understand this sentence:
This construction is the only one where we find a nominative subject in a non-finite clause.
Does it mean we can only find “nominative subject + doing phrase”, but we can’t find “nominative subject + done phrase”, “nominative subject + adj. phrase”, “nominative subject + adv. phrase” or “nominative subject + prepositional phrase”?
Nominative or plain case in non-complement gerund-participials
Gerund-participials functioning as supplement to a clause may contain a subject; pronouns with a nominative-accusative contrast usually appear in the nominative, with accusative a somewhat marginal alternant in informal style, while other NPs take plain case:
This construction is the only one where we find a nominative subject in a non-finite clause; it belongs to fairly formal style, and hence the informal accusative form in is unlikely: the alternation here is not like that between It’s I/me, where the accusative is much more common.
[64] i They appointed Max, [he/him being the only one who spoke Greek].
ii [His mother being ill,]Max had to withdraw from the expedition.
Source: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 2016 edition, P1191, P1192
I don’t quite understand this sentence:
This construction is the only one where we find a nominative subject in a non-finite clause.
Does it mean we can only find “nominative subject + doing phrase”, but we can’t find “nominative subject + done phrase”, “nominative subject + adj. phrase”, “nominative subject + adv. phrase” or “nominative subject + prepositional phrase”?