The content was not relevant.
Hi,
Question:
Which sentence is correct?
Sentence1:
The content on the PowerPoint slides was not relevent to our presentation.
Sentence2:
The contents on the PowerPoint slides were not relevent to our presentation.
Sentence3:
The context on the PowerPoint slides was not relevent to our presentation.
Sentence4:
The contexts on the PowerPoint slides were not relevent to our presentation.
Thanks
The content was not relevant.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
Hi,
Can I ask you a further question?
Which sentence is correct?
Sentence5:
All of the content was relevent to our presentation.
Sentence6:
All of the contents was relevent to our presentation.
Sentence7:
All of the content were relevent to our presentation.
Sentence8:
All of the contents were relevent to our presentation.
Thanks
You can't say "contents was" or "content were" because you won't have subject-verb agreement.
When you want to refer to "information" then use the non-countable version, content.
Contents is certainly a good word, but it would be used to describe what is inside a box, for example.
I have a hard time explaining the difference between content and contents in a way to would make sense to an English learner, so perhaps a real teacher can come and help explain the difference.
I also like both of emsr2d2's suggestions.
Oddly, I'd say "the content on the slides" but the "content of the presentation." However, I find nothing wrong with the "the content of the slides."
Last edited by Barb_D; 05-May-2010 at 13:47.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
Contents can be used when there's a list or separate objects- the contents of a book or the contents of your pockets.