1Likes -
1 Post By Raymott
-
"Married in 1970, they both loved books."
1. Tall and strongly built, he became an athlete.
2. Married in 1970, they both loved books.
In 1, there is an obvious logical connection between being tall and strongly built and becoming an athlete.
In 2, there is no similar connection. A love of books does not follow from being married. I keep seeing these constructs, often in descriptions of people or objects, and it seems wrong to me or at least confusing.
Is it wrong? Am I wrong? And why?
-
Re: "Married in 1970, they both loved books."

Originally Posted by
herfjj
1. Tall and strongly built, he became an athlete.
2. Married in 1970, they both loved books.
In 1, there is an obvious logical connection between being tall and strongly built and becoming an athlete.
In 2, there is no similar connection. A love of books does not follow from being married. I keep seeing these constructs, often in descriptions of people or objects, and it seems wrong to me or at least confusing.
Is it wrong? Am I wrong? And why?
No, you're not wrong. But the logical link doesn't have to be in the same sentence. 2 sounds odd out of context.
Similar Threads
-
By chebu in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 10-Jun-2010, 02:25
-
By Murid in forum Literature
Replies: 1
Last Post: 27-May-2010, 05:19
-
By vil in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 09-Nov-2009, 03:28
-
By sympathy in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 08-Sep-2008, 08:27
-
By Bushwhacker in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 6
Last Post: 01-Mar-2008, 06:48
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1