Why "are" instead of "is"?
"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resources are inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."
Thanks!
Was there a yes/no question somewhere? I thought it was is/are?
OK, I read that wrong. I thought he was asking if you would say "is" or "are."
Not a teacher only a native.
"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resourcesare inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."
Having read the sentence over and over again, 'is' seems to also fit.
I think this is to do with the 'a' (after London), which makes the 'massive amount of resources' appear as a single noun, but I could be wrong.
If it was just 'After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, massive amounts of resources are inevitably deployed....' then 'are' would be the word of choice.
Hopefully an actual teacher will clear things up.