Oakland, California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shouldn't there be, ignoring the percentages in parentheses, "who were/that were" between the whole numbers and the racial adjectives?The racial makeup of Oakland was 134,925 (34.5%) White, 109,471 (28.0%) African American, 3,040 (0.8%) Native American, 65,811 (16.8%) Asian, 2,222 (0.6%) Pacific Islander, 53,378 (13.7%) from other races, and 21,877 (5.6%) from two or more races.
No. It's fine as is.
Rover
But I don't think "He is a person good." is correct.
I was trying to ask how an adjective could come AFTER a noun.
There are no adjectives after nouns.
The racial makeup of Oakland was 134,925 (34.5%) White, 109,471 (28.0%) African American,...
The adjective noun of noun was number adjective, number adjective, ...
or, considered another way:
The adjective noun of noun was number noun, number noun, ...
The numbers are not nouns? I thought "134,925" in "134,925 (34.5%) White" stands for "134,925 people".
I think "White", "African American", "Asian", etc, are adjectives. If they were nouns, they would be in plural forms.
So, the example in the original post is missing a colon?