*Was you surprised when you heard about it?
I heard 'was' used with 'you' on a number of occasions (American English) and yes I was surprised. I realise it's incorrect but hearing it more and more often I'm wondering how disgraceful it sounds in an informal situation?
Last edited by nyota; 24-Aug-2011 at 14:22. Reason: typo
I wouldn't say 'disgraceful' - except in a sense that (to the best of my knowledge) the word never had: lacking gracefulness.
b
I hear that usage on Corrie all the time, more than from the lips of Yanks.
***** NOT A TEACHER *****
(1) You have asked an excellent question.
(2) I found the answer in A Grammar of the English Language, written by the one and
only Professor George O. Curme.
(3) "In older English, ...was ... was sometimes used for both singular and plural,
and for all persons."
(4) "Was was most frequently employed for were with the subject you where the
reference was to only one individual."
(a) Professor Curme cities this example: "Pray, Sir, how was you cured of your love?"
(5) Here in the United States, we had a scholar in the 19th century named Noah
Webster (the same person who compiled a famous dictionary). The great professor
quotes Mr. Webster as writing:
"The compilers of grammars condemn the use of was with you -- but in vain."
(a) (My words) Mr. Webster was wrong. It was not in vain. Books and teachers
have succeeded in stopping this use among educated people. Almost no one
says "You was ...." anymore in the United States. The only ones who do so are
people who have not had a good education or continue to speak the kind of English
that was passed down to them through their families.
P.S. It might astonish you to know that in the 19th century "He don't ...." was
common among all classes -- until teachers (bless them!) stopped that practice
by constantly criticizing it.