7Likes -
2 Post By Raymott -
1 Post By ~Mav~ -
3 Post By bhaisahab -
1 Post By riquecohen
-
appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?
Hello folks.
I have a doubt about the sentences below. Could you help me to find out whether they are correct?
I'm appalled (or shocked) by hearing that you were fired.
I'm appalled (or shocked) to hear that you were fired.
Thanks in advanced. :)
Cheers 
Wanderson
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?

Originally Posted by
wandersonxs
Hello folks.
I have a doubt about the sentences below. Could you help me to find out whether they are correct?
I'm appalled (or shocked) by hearing that you were fired.
I'm appalled (or shocked) to hear that you were fired.
Thanks in advanced. :)
Cheers

Wanderson
Only the second one sounds right. The first isn't colloquial. (It's grammatical, but no one would actually say it).
You might occasionally read, "He was appalled on hearing that Peter had been fired."
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?

Originally Posted by
Raymott
Only the second one sounds right. The first isn't colloquial. (It's grammatical, but no one would actually say it).
You might occasionally read, "He was appalled on hearing that Peter had been fired."
How about "at"? "He was appalled at hearing that Peter had been fired."
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?
@Raymott
How about, "He was appalled at your/Peter's having been fired."? It sounds absolutely grammatical to me (and I can't help but like possessive forms with gerund
), but I wonder how it sounds to an English ear.
(Even if you deem it to be unnatural, maybe your being right doesn't necessarily mean my being wrong.
Would you use a sentence like this?
I promise NOT to stretch it any further.
)
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?

Originally Posted by
~Mav~
@Raymott
How about, "He was appalled
at your/Peter's having been fired."? It sounds absolutely grammatical to me (and I can't help but like possessive forms with gerund

), but I wonder how it sounds to an English ear.

(Even if you deem it to be unnatural, maybe
your being right doesn't necessarily mean my being wrong. 
Would you use a sentence like this?

I promise NOT to stretch it any further.

)
"He was appalled at your having been fired" is grammatical but I would probably never use it. It's very formal and quite dated.
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?
Thank you for your prompt reply, bhaisahab.
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?
thanks folks.
It really helped me.
-
Re: appalled by hearing or appalled to hear?

Originally Posted by
~Mav~
@Raymott
How about, "He was appalled
at your/Peter's having been fired."? It sounds absolutely grammatical to me (and I can't help but like possessive forms with gerund

), but I wonder how it sounds to an English ear.

(Even if you deem it to be unnatural, maybe
your being right doesn't necessarily mean my being wrong. 
Would you use a sentence like this?

I promise NOT to stretch it any further.

)
I, too, like the possessive + -ing form. It is grammatically correct and I use it and frequently hear it when I'm in the US.
Similar Threads
-
By duiter in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 18-Oct-2010, 03:48
-
By wotcha in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 22-Aug-2010, 18:58
-
By ian2 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 18-Mar-2009, 14:24
-
By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 11-Dec-2007, 12:58
-
By Mariaeuge14 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 6
Last Post: 07-Nov-2003, 18:04
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1