Hello,
this is a real life example of the problem I discussed in a separate post
"...155839-use-definite-article-plural-noun"
regarding the meaning of
THE + A PLURAL NOUN
construct. Here is an example from an article that I am writing:
"In the previous studies it was shown that [the] equation system for [the] exact factorial moments is given by..."
Are [the]s correct? How would a native English speaking person understand this sentence.
Regards
Zoran
Of course, a factorial moment is diligently defined in the introduction. It is simply an object labeled by an integer index. The full set of factorial moments is infinte
f0, f1, f2, f3, f4, ... never stops
I am not sure how to refer to this full set, using "the" or without it.
Last edited by zorank; 29-Sep-2011 at 14:33.
The first "the" is necessary. The second is probably optional.
Thanks! Please bear with me...
If I want that say something like
(1) "In the previous studies it was shown that [the] equation system for the full set of factorial moments, f0, f1, f2, f3, etc up to infinity is given by..."
could I say it like this
(2) "In the previous studies it was shown that [the] equation system for the exact factorial moments is given by..."
Please note the second "the" in the sentence. Are (1) and (2) equivalent?
I'm not sure why you have the word "exact" in there.
I would use the second "the" in both sentences.
This is usually written like this:f0, f1, f2, f3, etc up to infinity
f0, f1, f2, f3,...
It's unambiguous and short. If you want to stick to your version, lose the "etc" (which requires a full stop) because it's widely considered poor style to use abbreviations when they're unnecessary. "And so forth" works very well.
Last edited by birdeen's call; 30-Sep-2011 at 23:07.