"If he keeps up his spending habits, he will have been $100,000 in debt."
If I take that sentence and claim his father said that, then:
"His father said If he keeps/kept up his spending habits, he will/would have been $100,000 in debt."
What should I do with "keep/kept" and "will/would"?
The verb tenses in both clauses must agree in time:
If he keeps up his spending habits, he will be $100,000 in debt."
So, either of,
"His father said If he keeps up his spending habits, he will have been $100,000 in debt."
"His father said If he kept up his spending habits, he would have been $100,000 in debt."
is okay?
Hi bob, and welcome to the forums.
For the first, it must be "...habits, he will be $100,000..."
For the second, I would have written "... if he had kept up his ..." but conditionals are not my strong suit. (I am not very good at them.) It's possible your way without the past perfect is okay too.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
I agree with Barb: that sentence is not natural. Only 'will be' works in the sentence as it stands.
Reporting this, we end up with either:His father said (that) if he keeps up....,he will be ...
or: His father said that if he kept up ... he would be...
Both are possible.
His father said that he he had kept up .... he would be/would have been... . This is possible, but reports different sentences from the one we considered originally.
So, future perfect doesn't exist in modern English?
Last edited by Barb_D; 09-Nov-2011 at 19:16. Reason: fixed potentially confusing typo