Are these correct? If not please explain.
-----------
She lets the rabbit eats the apple.
She lets the rabbit eats apples.
The rabbit eats the apple.
-----------
Thanks.
The rabbit eats apples.
This is fine. The verb "to eat" is used in the third person singular form here.
In the other two sentences, it is not important how many apples are consumed. What is important is the verb pattern structure of the verb "to let."
to let + object + bare infinitive (the infinitive without to)
She lets + the rabbit + eat (apples or the apple.)
I hope this helps.
Stephen
http://www.ieltsonly.co.uk
The simple form is a verb without the 's' at the end? Example: 'eat', not 'eats'?
Thanks.
What English Freak referred to as the 'simple form' is more generally known as the 'bare infinitive'. The bare infinitive follows modals and a very small number of other verbs. The 'to-infinitive follows many other verbs:
I can/might/will/would/etc do this.
I want/hope/am trying/etc to do this.
Please let me/help me/watch me do this.
Please allow me/permit me/tell me to do this.
Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.
Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.
Yes, right, I agree. Just thought this term might be easier to understand.
Are any of these wrong..? Here is what I learned today:
These are colors that identify the words below.
Verb
Object
Bare infinitive (the infinitive without 'to' and without "s", "ing", "ed", and etc. at the end of the verb, ex: 'eat'; also called base form or simple form)
Infinitive (like bare infin but with 'to', ex: 'to eat')
She lets the rabbit eat apples.
Thanks again... :]
Last edited by Tepal; 08-Dec-2011 at 14:09.