Hello Merry Christmas,
Can I ask a conditional sentence, please? I think it's type three.
Is my sentence correct below?
If I hadn't met Michelle, I might/would have not known how to make delicious dessert.
Thank you.![]()
[QUOTE=Supermonkey;836320]
If I hadn't met Michelle, I might/would have not known how to make delicious dessert.
NOT A TEACHER
(1) I think that your sentence is GREAT.
(a) You just might want to make three little changes:
(i) I would prefer "learned" rather than "known."
(ii) the position of "not": might/would not have learned ....
(iii) I think it should be desserts.
(2) IMHO, I think that your choice of modal also makes a difference:
(a) I might not have learned. = But if I had not met Michelle, there would have been the
possibility that someone else would have taught me.
(b) I would not have learned. = If I had not met Michelle, I would have never learned
to make delicious desserts. She was my only chance.
Thank you for the mixed conditional. It's very complicated to me.
I remember my English teacher told me mixed conditional is usually with type three and type two. Mixing type one and type two are not common. (Or are not correct? I can't remember exactly.)
I am confused it all the time. For instance, If the sentences are correct below? (Type1+Type2)
If you are late again, I wouldn't be your friend any more. (I know he will definitely late, and I am kidding that we were not friends soon.)
If you won one million dollars, will you make a 20% donation? (If I use past tense in second sentence, will it mean the guy highly hasn't got the intention to donate?)
If you pouch the wall, you could break your bone. (He is going to punch, and I imagine it has the risk to break his hand.)
Thank you so much.
My advice would be: stop worrying about labelling. There aren't three (or four, or five) types of conditional sentence - there are more than fifty.
When we consider the verb in the if-clause, we are concerned with whether or not the hypothetical situation is presented as a real possibility (in which case there is no shifting of tense to a distanced/remote/'past' form) or whether it is presented as an unlikely/unreal possibility (in which case there is a shifting).
Once we have that part clear, then we can begin to think about the consequential clause, and how real that might be.
Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.
[QUOTE=Supermonkey;836343]
If I want to use salad instead of desserts , should I use plural too? salads?
If someone does not answer you soon, you might want to post this
question in a new thread.