Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree6Likes
  • 2 Post By emsr2d2
  • 2 Post By SoothingDave
  • 1 Post By BobSmith
  • 1 Post By 5jj

Thread: is to be vs is supposed to be

  1. #1
    AlexAD's Avatar
    AlexAD is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Russian
      • Home Country:
      • Belarus
      • Current Location:
      • Belarus
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    529

    Default is to be vs is supposed to be

    Hello.

    I am rewriting the phrase, 'Node must not be null' or 'Node must be not null' and have the following results:

    1. 'Node is not to be null',
    2. 'Node is not supposed to be null'

    Do 1 and 2 means the same? Or pretty much the same?

    Thanks, Alex.

  2. #2
    emsr2d2 is online now VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    9,023
    Teacher

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexAD View Post
    Hello.

    I am rewriting the phrase, 'Node must not be null' or 'Node must be not null' and have the following results:

    1. 'Node is not to be null',
    2. 'Node is not supposed to be null'

    Do 1 and 2 means the same? Or pretty much the same?

    Thanks, Alex.
    Do you have some more context? I have no idea what "Node must not be null" means!
    5jj and AlexAD like this.

  3. #3
    SoothingDave is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,705

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Why are you re-writing? "Node must not be null" is the clearest form, to me. If you're afraid people won't understand "must not be," then say "is not supposed to be" or "is not allowed to be."
    emsr2d2 and AlexAD like this.

  4. #4
    BobSmith is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    902

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    [nat]

    1 means "Node must not be null"
    2 means "Node should not be null, but it might be."

    If you need to ensure it is never null, I think your original phrase is best, "Node must not be null".
    AlexAD likes this.

  5. #5
    AlexAD's Avatar
    AlexAD is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Russian
      • Home Country:
      • Belarus
      • Current Location:
      • Belarus
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    529
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Quote Originally Posted by emsr2d2 View Post
    Do you have some more context? I have no idea what "Node must not be null" means!
    It connected with computer science.
    Node is a variable that can be assigned a value. A value can be an object or null (no object).
    I wish I would explain it better than that but I am afraid I cannot.
    Last edited by AlexAD; 10-Jan-2012 at 16:47.

  6. #6
    AlexAD's Avatar
    AlexAD is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Russian
      • Home Country:
      • Belarus
      • Current Location:
      • Belarus
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    529
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    Why are you re-writing? "Node must not be null" is the clearest form, to me. If you're afraid people won't understand "must not be," then say "is not supposed to be" or "is not allowed to be."
    I recognize that you might have on your mind something like 'Why doesn't this weird guy just stick to the simplest solution!'

    Though, my answer is this is the way I learn written English trying to get alternatives at some point.
    By the way, I got that approach from the OALD!
    Hopefully, it will clarify why I am asking such a dumb question

    And as you usual, I would appreciate if you would correct grammar in this post.

    Thanks, Alex.
    Last edited by AlexAD; 11-Jan-2012 at 14:13.

  7. #7
    AlexAD's Avatar
    AlexAD is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Russian
      • Home Country:
      • Belarus
      • Current Location:
      • Belarus
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    529
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    It is been a while since I got the last answer, so I am putting this thread at the top.
    I would be more than happy if you would answer.

    Thanks, Alex.

  8. #8
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj
    5jj is online now Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,010
    Teacher

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexAD View Post
    It is been a while since I got the last answer, so I am putting this thread at the top.
    I would be more than happy if you would answer.
    Posts #3 and #4 seem to have answered your question. What are you not clear about?
    AlexAD likes this.
    Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.


  9. #9
    AlexAD's Avatar
    AlexAD is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Russian
      • Home Country:
      • Belarus
      • Current Location:
      • Belarus
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    529
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: is to be vs is supposed to be

    Oh.. Sorry. You are right, I haven't read BobSmith's post thoroughly.
    Thanks.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] To be supposed to/need.
    By Ksenia in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29-Oct-2011, 15:20
  2. supposed to be
    By debsox in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-Apr-2010, 06:48
  3. supposed
    By wowenglish1 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-Oct-2009, 16:59
  4. [Grammar] What exactly does AIN'T mean and when is it supposed to be used?
    By ALDITO in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-Oct-2009, 00:00
  5. [Grammar] be supposed to
    By gchman in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 26-Sep-2009, 19:35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0