Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By 5jj

Thread: Why is 'had had' used?

  1. #1
    Tan Elaine is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,550

    Default Why is 'had had' used?

    We learnt the next day he had had to hand in his uniform and get off the job as fast as he could.

    Would it be correct if 'had' is used instead of 'had had'?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj
    5jj is online now Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,010
    Teacher

    Default Re: Why is 'had had' used?

    It is the past perfect of 'have to', and is fine. The past perfect suggests that the having to hand in the uniform and the handing in happened before we heard about it. The simple past, 'had to' could be used if the handing in had not taken place when we heard about it.
    Tan Elaine likes this.
    Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0