Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By BobK
  • 1 Post By philo2009

Thread: omission of to in to-infinitive.

  1. #1
    wotcha's Avatar
    wotcha is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    410
    Teacher

    Default omission of to in to-infinitive.

    I've learned that 'to' can be omitted when it is used as a complement of a be verb in sentences that are initiated by 'what S + V ', 'All S + V' and 'The only thing S + V ' clauses. For example


    1. What I want is back to school
    2. What I want is to go back to school
    3. What I want is going back to school.

    All three sentence are grammatically correct. - Is that right?

    Also,

    4. All you need is study hard.
    5. The only thing you need is be independent.

    Are the sentence 4 and 5 grammatically acceptable?


    Thanks in advance. ^_^;

  2. #2
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj
    5jj is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,014
    Teacher

    Default Re: omission of to in to-infinitive.

    Quote Originally Posted by wotcha View Post
    1. What I want is back to school.X
    2. What I want is to go back to school.
    2a. What I want to do is (to) go back to school.
    3. What I want is going back to school.X
    4. All you need is study hard.X
    4a. All you need to do is (to) study hard.
    5. The only thing you need is be independent. X;
    5
    Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.


  3. #3
    wotcha's Avatar
    wotcha is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    410
    Threadstarter / Original Poster
    Teacher

    Default Re: omission of to in to-infinitive.

    Quote Originally Posted by 5jj View Post
    5

    What about this sentence?

    'The only thing you have to remember is bring your passport'


    Is it correct?

    ^^;;

  4. #4
    BobK's Avatar
    BobK is offline Harmless drudge
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,932
    Teacher

    Default Re: omission of to in to-infinitive.

    [addressed to 5jj's post]1 is not unlike a form with 'rid', common in Scotland and many other dialectal forms: 'I want rid of him' [=I want to be rid of him].

    The words 'The only thing you have to remember is [this], or : bring your passport' would be acceptable if the intonation reflected the punctuation I've added.

    b
    Last edited by BobK; 24-Jan-2012 at 10:07. Reason: Added 2nd sentence
    5jj likes this.

  5. #5
    philo2009 is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,227
    Teacher

    Default Re: omission of to in to-infinitive.

    Quote Originally Posted by wotcha View Post
    I've learned that 'to' can be omitted when it is used as a complement of a be verb in sentences that are initiated by 'what S + V ', 'All S + V' and 'The only thing S + V ' clauses.
    You've either misremembered, or been mis-taught, the rule, which is that omission of 'to' before a complemental infinitive (VP2) in such constructions as [All + S + VP1 + is + VP2] occurs

    (1) (obligatorily) where the finite element of VP1 is either a form of 'do' or a modal auxiliary with 'do' as its dependent, thus

    All he did was wait.

    All he does is wait.


    All he can do is wait.

    (NOT: *...to wait..)

    (2) (optionally) where the finite element of VP1 is a non-modal verb complemented by 'to do', thus

    All he has to do is wait.

    (or ...to wait...)

    In the case of constructions not covered by the above rule, the form of VP2 is simply identical to that of any verbal dependent of VP1, thus e.g.

    All I want is to go back to school.


    (Not: *...go back...)

    All I enjoy is sitting and listening to music.


    (Not: *... (to) sit and (to) listen...)

    and so forth.
    Last edited by philo2009; 26-Jan-2012 at 04:58.
    5jj likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17-Jan-2012, 15:21
  2. full infinitive or bare infinitive
    By chance22 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-May-2010, 00:06
  3. [Grammar] Question about omission (I don't know if it's even called omission)
    By HaraKiriBlade in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29-Oct-2009, 11:56
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-Nov-2007, 09:41
  5. progressive infinitive VS ordinary infinitive
    By hela in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-Oct-2005, 17:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0