would be found VS would have been found
Which one is better in the sentence below, 'would be found' or 'would have been found'? And why?
"In 1950s, Colorado beetles were able to resist chemical insecticides. A scientist hypothesized that bacteria living in the beetles' environment were killing many beetles, because otherwise the beetles [ would be found / would have been found ] in larger numbers."
Thank you very much in advance.
Re: would be found VS would have been found
Either form is possible. The first would be appropriate if the hypothetical finding of the beetles were to be happening at the same time as the hypothesising about the bateria; the second, if the hypothetical finding had preceded the hypothesising.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
By Tan Elaine in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 20-Mar-2012, 19:24
By atssarbia in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 07-Feb-2011, 07:28
By Indec in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 20-Nov-2008, 14:27
By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 02-Dec-2006, 21:06
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO