1Likes -
1 Post By bhaisahab
-
Conditionals
'I wasn't tall enough to reach the shelf.' (taller)
The answer is: 'If I had been taller, I'd reach the shelf.' I don't understand why it is incorrect to say - 'If I were taller, I'd have reached the shelf.'
-
Re: Conditionals

Originally Posted by
barnej0096
'I wasn't tall enough to reach the shelf.' (taller)
The answer is: 'If I had been taller, I'd reach the shelf.' I don't understand why it is incorrect to say - 'If I were taller, I'd have reached the shelf.'
'If I had been taller, I'd reach the shelf.' This is incorrect. 'I wasn't tall enough to reach the shelf.' this sentence is in the past tense.
These are possible: 'If I had been taller, I'd have reached/I could have reached/I would have been able to reach the shelf". "If I were" is conditional present "were" is subjunctive.It doesn't fit with "I'd have reached".
-
Re: Conditionals
"If I were" is conditional present "were" is subjunctive.It doesn't fit with "I'd have reached". I do not understand it. Can you please explain to me, why we cannot say 'If I were taller, I'd have reached the shelf.' considering it a mixed conditional with an explanation like this: I am not taller and that is why I was not able to reach the shelf.
Thank you 
-
Re: Conditionals
I don't understand it either.
Similar Threads
-
By triannen in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 11-Jun-2011, 10:38
-
By Ram100 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 3
Last Post: 22-Jun-2008, 07:02
-
By noreen in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 04-Jun-2008, 11:21
-
By letyqu in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 15-Feb-2008, 04:15
-
By zahari in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 09-Nov-2006, 23:53
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1