4Likes -
1 Post By konungursvia -
1 Post By Raymott -
2 Post By Tdol
-
Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
Dear teachers,
Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense after by 2010 ?
A steady but significant rise can be seen in the percentage of the population that owned
a computer over the period. Just over half the population owned computers in 2002,
whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a home computer.
Why not ....... bby 2010 three out of four people had had a home computer instead of had
http://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/...el_Answers.pdf
Thanks
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
English is often unclear about past imperfect tenses being clearly expressed as imperfect, but here we use "had a computer" as a past continuous (imperfect) because people keep their computer for 2 years or more. If we chose a verb whose meaning conveyed an act that was punctual, inchoative, temporary or quick (e.g. to buy a computer) then we would use the pluperfect as you suggest ("had bought a computer").
Do you see my meaning?
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
Thanks for your reply
I am sorry, no I am still confused
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?

Originally Posted by
duiter
Thanks for your reply
I am sorry, no I am still confused
There's no need for the past perfect there (if that's what you mean by "past particle tense").
Can you explain why you think it should be "had had"?
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
I think he is confused with this sentence.(from the article he refers to)
In 2002, only around 15% of those who did not finish high school had a computer but this figure had trebled by 2010.
Just over half the population owned computers in 2002, whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a home computer.
Both are correct. The first sentence has the subject “this figure” and the second one, “three out of four people”. The subjects differ and so do the tenses: “had trebled” and “had”, although the time phrase is the same, “by 2010”.
Hope you understand!
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
By 2010 three out of four people had a computer- they still had a computer
By 2010 three out of four people had had a computer- they may have stopped owning one
-
Re: Why doesn't the writer use past particle tense ?
It would be weird to use the Past Perfect with a possessive have except to express for how long.
It 2008 I had a car.
In 2008 I had had my car for 6 years.
In your sentence 2010 is finished - so we just use the Past Simple. Is that clear now? Why do you think you'd need the Past Perfect?
Similar Threads
-
By Yura Reiri in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-Mar-2012, 11:14
-
By alfree in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 10-Feb-2012, 16:28
-
By aysaa in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 4
Last Post: 16-Jan-2012, 20:14
-
By prianca.p4 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 11-Oct-2011, 18:09
-
By Mairead Mockler in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 13-Oct-2008, 16:55
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1