Dangerous!![]()
I know how to play a flute.
Would it be wrong if I used 'blow' instead of 'play'?
Thanks.
Dangerous!![]()
Totally wrong.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
Apart from anything else, one does not blow a flute. One blows across the mouthpiece using "embouchure". Stick with "I know how to play the flute".
Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.
What about 'trumpet'? Is it the same?
I play the trumpet.
Using 'blow' is dangerous too, I assume.
Thanks.
We generally use "the" when talking about the ability to play a musical instrument.
I can play the flute.
I play the guitar.
He plays the piano.
Some people omit the article completely.
As far as the original question goes, I would avoid using "to blow" when talking generally about musical instruments. Even though that is how some of them are played, we don't use it that way very often.
Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.
I'm not a teacher yet, but I am studying a Bachelor of Education with an English Literature major at Charles Sturt University, in NSW, Australia.
The common idiom 'blow your own trumpet' has made 'blow the trumpet' sound acceptable as an alternative to 'play the trumpet'.
There's also a Christmas song called 'Blow the trumpet and bang the drum'.
Rover
Yes - 'blow' is fine for 'trumpet'; it can be used for unskilful playing (though that's not the only use). But for a flute it would only work if you had a number of flutes hung up like wind-chimes.
(And, Rover, I see your Christmas song and raise you the Chorus of Peers in Iolanthe - 'Blow the trumpet bang the brasses' - an odd thing to bang, but WSG wanted a rhyme for 'lower-middle classes')
b