Because "acclaimed" is simply being used as an adjective.
One of the first books I read upon graduating college, Liar's Poker is acclaimed author Michael Lewis' first book — a captivating story about his short-lived postcollegiate career as a bond salesman in the 1980s.
(11 Books Every Young Leader Must Read)
Why not "is an acclaimed author Michael Lewis' first book"?
Thanks.
Because "acclaimed" is simply being used as an adjective.
I'm not a teacher of English, but I have spoken it for (almost) all of my life....
Think of it like this:
Liar's Poker is the first book of (the) acclaimed author Michael Lewis.
Rover
Now I can see why there's no article in the original sentence. What I don't fully understand now is why 'author' is used without an article.It's the first book written by acclaimed author Michael Lewis.
Thanks.
This seems to be a journalistic usage that is creeping into the general language.It's still correct to use the definite article, and I recommend that you do.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
It's a common construct.
I'm answering a question by frequent poster suprunp.
The question has already been answered by moderators 5jj and bhaisahab.
Sometimes there'll be a comma: We're pleased to welcome three-times award winner, Billy Bunter.